Christianpedia

Poverty

Template:Redirect

Page Template:Multiple image/styles.css has no content.

Clockwise from top left: a homeless man in Toronto, Canada; a disabled man begging in the streets of Beijing, China; waste pickers in Lucknow, India; A mother with her malnourished child in a clinic near Dadaab, Kenya;

Poverty is a state or condition in which one lacks the financial resources and essentials for a certain standard of living. Poverty can have diverse environmental, legal, social, economic, and political causes and effects.[1] When evaluating poverty in statistics or economics there are two main measures: absolute poverty compares income against the amount needed to meet basic personal needs, such as food, clothing, and shelter;[2] relative poverty measures when a person cannot meet a minimum level of living standards, compared to others in the same time and place. The definition of relative poverty varies from one country to another, or from one society to another.[2]

Statistically, since 2019, most of the world's population live in poverty: in PPP dollars, 85% of people live on less than $30 per day, two-thirds live on less than $10 per day, and 10% live on less than $1.90 per day.[3] According to the World Bank Group in 2020, more than 40% of the poor live in conflict-affected countries.[4] Even when countries experience economic development, the poorest citizens of middle-income countries frequently do not gain an adequate share of their countries' increased wealth to leave poverty.[5] Governments and non-governmental organizations have experimented with a number of different policies and programs for poverty alleviation, such as electrification in rural areas or housing first policies in urban areas. The international policy frameworks for poverty alleviation, established by the United Nations in 2015, are summarized in Sustainable Development Goal 1: "No Poverty".

Social forces, such as gender, disability, race and ethnicity, can exacerbate issues of poverty—with women, children and minorities frequently bearing unequal burdens of poverty. Moreover, impoverished individuals are more vulnerable to the effects of other social issues, such as the environmental effects of industry or the impacts of climate change or other natural disasters or extreme weather events. Poverty can also make other social problems worse; economic pressures on impoverished communities frequently play a part in deforestation, biodiversity loss and ethnic conflict. For this reason, the UN's Sustainable Development Goals and other international policy programs, such as the international recovery from COVID-19, emphasize the connection of poverty alleviation with other societal goals.[6]

Template:TOC limit

Definitions and etymology[edit]

The word poverty comes from the old (Norman) French word poverté (Modern French: pauvreté), from Latin paupertās from pauper (poor).[7]

There are several definitions of poverty depending on the context of the situation it is placed in. It usually references a state or condition in which a person or community lacks the financial resources and essentials for a certain standard of living.

United Nations: Fundamentally, poverty is a denial of choices and opportunities, a violation of human dignity. It means lack of basic capacity to participate effectively in society. It means not having enough to feed and clothe a family, not having a school or clinic to go to, not having the land on which to grow one's food or a job to earn one's living, not having access to credit. It means insecurity, powerlessness and exclusion of individuals, households and communities. It means susceptibility to violence, and it often implies living in marginal or fragile environments, without access to clean water or sanitation.[8]

World Bank: Poverty is pronounced deprivation in well-being, and comprises many dimensions. It includes low incomes and the inability to acquire the basic goods and services necessary for survival with dignity. Poverty also encompasses low levels of health and education, poor access to clean water and sanitation, inadequate physical security, lack of voice, and insufficient capacity and opportunity to better one's life.[9]

European Union (EU): The European Union's definition of poverty is significantly different from definitions in other parts of the world, and consequently policy measures introduced to combat poverty in EU countries also differ from measures in other nations. Poverty is measured in relation to the distribution of income in each member country using relative income poverty lines.[10] Relative-income poverty rates in the EU are compiled by the Eurostat, in charge of coordinating, gathering, and disseminating member country statistics using European Union Survey of Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) surveys.[10]

Measuring poverty[edit]

The number of people below different poverty lines

Absolute poverty[edit]

Poverty headcount ratio at $1.90 a day (2011 PPP) (% of population). Based on World Bank data ranging from 1998 to 2018.[11]

Absolute poverty, often synonymous with 'extreme poverty' or 'abject poverty', refers to a set standard which is consistent over time and between countries. This set standard usually refers to "a condition characterized by severe deprivation of basic human needs, including food, safe drinking water, sanitation facilities, health, shelter, education and information. It depends not only on income but also on access to services."[12][13][14] Having an income below the poverty line, which is defined as an income needed to purchase basic needs, is also referred to as primary poverty.

The "dollar a day" poverty line was first introduced in 1990 as a measure to meet such standards of living. For nations that do not use the US dollar as currency, "dollar a day" does not translate to living a day on the equivalent amount of local currency as determined by the exchange rate.[15] Rather, it is determined by the purchasing power parity rate, which would look at how much local currency is needed to buy the same things that a dollar could buy in the United States.[15] Usually, this would translate to having less local currency than if the exchange rate were used.[15]

From 1993 through 2005, the World Bank defined absolute poverty as $1.08 a day on such a purchasing power parity basis, after adjusting for inflation to the 1993 US dollar[16] In 2009, it was updated as $1.25 a day (equivalent to $1.00 a day in 1996 US prices)[17][18] and in 2015, it was updated as living on less than US$1.90 per day,[19] and moderate poverty as less than $2 or $5 a day.[20] Similarly, 'ultra-poverty' is defined by a 2007 report issued by International Food Policy Research Institute as living on less than 54 cents per day.[21] The poverty line threshold of $1.90 per day, as set by the World Bank, is controversial. Each nation has its own threshold for absolute poverty line; in the United States, for example, the absolute poverty line was US$15.15 per day in 2010 (US$22,000 per year for a family of four),[22] while in India it was US$1.0 per day[23] and in China the absolute poverty line was US$0.55 per day, each on PPP basis in 2010.[24] These different poverty lines make data comparison between each nation's official reports qualitatively difficult. Some scholars argue that the World Bank method sets the bar too high,[25] others argue it is too low.

Children of the Depression-era migrant workers, Arizona, United States, 1937

There is disagreement among experts as to what would be considered a realistic poverty rate with one considering it "an inaccurately measured and arbitrary cut off".[26] Some contend that a higher poverty line is needed, such as a minimum of $7.40 or even $10 to $15 a day. They argue that these levels are a minimum for basic needs and to achieve normal life expectancy.[27]

One estimate places the true scale of poverty much higher than the World Bank, with an estimated 4.3 billion people (59% of the world's population) living with less than $5 a day and unable to meet basic needs adequately.[28] Philip Alston, a UN special rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, stated the World Bank's international poverty line of $1.90 a day is fundamentally flawed, and has allowed for "self congratulatory" triumphalism in the fight against extreme global poverty, which he asserts is "completely off track" and that nearly half of the global population, or 3.4 billion, lives on less than $5.50 a day, and this number has barely moved since 1990.[29] Still others suggest that poverty line misleads because many live on far less than that line.[23][30][31]

Other measures of absolute poverty without using a certain dollar amount include the standard defined as receiving less than 80% of minimum caloric intake whilst spending more than 80% of income on food, sometimes called ultra-poverty.[32]

Relative poverty[edit]

Graphical representation of the Gini coefficient, a common measure of inequality. The Gini coefficient is equal to the area marked A divided by the sum of the areas marked A and B, that is, Gini = A/(A + B).

Relative poverty views poverty as socially defined and dependent on social context. It is argued that the needs considered fundamental is not an objective measure[33][34] and could change with the custom of society.[35][33] For example, a person who cannot afford housing better than a small tent in an open field would be said to live in relative poverty if almost everyone else in that area lives in modern brick homes, but not if everyone else also lives in small tents in open fields (for example, in a nomadic tribe). Since richer nations would have lower levels of absolute poverty,[36][37] relative poverty is considered the "most useful measure for ascertaining poverty rates in wealthy developed nations"[38][39][40][41][42] and is the "most prominent and most-quoted of the EU social inclusion indicators".[43]

Usually, relative poverty is measured as the percentage of the population with income less than some fixed proportion of median income. This is a calculation of the percentage of people whose family household income falls below the Poverty Line. The main poverty line used in the Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the European Union (EU) is based on "economic distance", a level of income set at 60% of the median household income.[44] The United States federal government typically regulates this line to three times the cost of an adequate meal.[45]

There are several other different income inequality metrics, for example, the Gini coefficient or the Theil Index.

Global share of wealth by wealth group —Credit Suisse, 2021
The Gini coefficient, a measure of income inequality. Based on World Bank data ranging from 1992 to 2018.[46]

Other aspects[edit]

World map of countries by Human Development Index categories in increments of 0.050 (based on 2019 data, published in 2020)
Template:LegendTemplate:LegendTemplate:LegendTemplate:LegendTemplate:Legend Template:LegendTemplate:LegendTemplate:LegendTemplate:LegendTemplate:Legend Template:LegendTemplate:LegendTemplate:Legend

Rather than income, poverty is also measured through individual basic needs at a time. Life expectancy has greatly increased in the developing world since World War II and is starting to close the gap to the developed world.[47] Child mortality has decreased in every developing region of the world.[48] The proportion of the world's population living in countries where the daily per-capita supply of food energy is less than 9,200 kilojoules (2,200 kilocalories) decreased from 56% in the mid-1960s to below 10% by the 1990s. Similar trends can be observed for literacy, access to clean water and electricity and basic consumer items.[49]

An early morning outside the Opera Tavern in Stockholm, with beggars waiting for scraps from the previous day. Sweden, 1868.

Poverty may also be understood as an aspect of unequal social status and inequitable social relationships, experienced as social exclusion, dependency, and diminished capacity to participate, or to develop meaningful connections with other people in society.[50][51][52] Such social exclusion can be minimized through strengthened connections with the mainstream, such as through the provision of relational care to those who are experiencing poverty. The World Bank's "Voices of the Poor", based on research with over 20,000 poor people in 23 countries, identifies a range of factors which poor people identify as part of poverty. These include abuse by those in power, dis-empowering institutions, excluded locations, gender relationships, lack of security, limited capabilities, physical limitations, precarious livelihoods, problems in social relationships, weak community organizations and discrimination. Analysis of social aspects of poverty links conditions of scarcity to aspects of the distribution of resources and power in a society and recognizes that poverty may be a function of the diminished "capability" of people to live the kinds of lives they value. The social aspects of poverty may include lack of access to information, education, health care, social capital or political power.[53][54] Relational poverty is the idea that societal poverty exists if there is a lack of human relationships. Relational poverty can be the result of a lost contact number, lack of phone ownership, isolation, or deliberate severing of ties with an individual or community. Relational poverty is also understood "by the social institutions that organize those relationships...poverty is importantly the result of the different terms and conditions on which people are included in social life".[55]

In the United Kingdom, the second Cameron ministry came under attack for its redefinition of poverty; poverty is no longer classified by a family's income, but as to whether a family is in work or not.[56] Considering that two-thirds of people who found work were accepting wages that are below the living wage (according to the Joseph Rowntree Foundation[57]) this has been criticised by anti-poverty campaigners as an unrealistic view of poverty in the United Kingdom.[56]

Secondary poverty[edit]

Secondary poverty refers to those that earn enough income to not be impoverished, but who spend their income on unnecessary pleasures, such as alcoholic beverages, thus placing them below it in practice.[58] In 18th- and 19th-century Great Britain, the practice of temperance among Methodists, as well as their rejection of gambling, allowed them to eliminate secondary poverty and accumulate capital.[59] Factors that contribute to secondary poverty includes but are not limited to: alcohol, gambling, tobacco and drugs. Substance abuse means that the poor typically spend about 2% of their income educating their children but larger percentages of alcohol and tobacco (for example, 6% in Indonesia and 8% in Mexico).[60]

Variability[edit]

Poverty levels are snapshot pictures in time that omits the transitional dynamics between levels. Mobility statistics supply additional information about the fraction who leave the poverty level. For example, one study finds that in a sixteen-year period (1975 to 1991 in the US) only 5% of those in the lower fifth of the income level were still at that level, while 95% transitioned to a higher income category.[61] Poverty levels can remain the same while those who rise out of poverty are replaced by others. The transient poor and chronic poor differ in each society. In a nine-year period ending in 2005 for the US, 50% of the poorest quintile transitioned to a higher quintile.[62]

Global prevalence[edit]

Worlds regions by total wealth (in trillions USD), 2018

According to Chen and Ravallion, about 1.76 billion people in developing world lived above $1.25 per day and 1.9 billion people lived below $1.25 per day in 1981. In 2005, about 4.09 billion people in developing world lived above $1.25 per day and 1.4 billion people lived below $1.25 per day (both 1981 and 2005 data are on inflation adjusted basis).[63][64] The share of the world's population living in absolute poverty fell from 43% in 1981 to 14% in 2011.[65] The absolute number of people in poverty fell from 1.95 billion in 1981 to 1.01 billion in 2011.[66] The economist Max Roser estimates that the number of people in poverty is therefore roughly the same as 200 years ago.[66] This is the case since the world population was just little more than 1 billion in 1820 and the majority (84% to 94%)[67] of the world population was living in poverty. According to one study, the percentage of the world population in hunger and poverty fell in absolute percentage terms from 50% in 1950 to 30% in 1970.[68] According to another study the number of people worldwide living in absolute poverty fell from 1.18 billion in 1950 to 1.04 billion in 1977.[69] According to another study, the number of people worldwide estimated to be starving fell from almost 920 million in 1971 to below 797 million in 1997.[70] The proportion of the developing world's population living in extreme economic poverty fell from 28% in 1990 to 21% in 2001.[65] Most of this improvement has occurred in East and South Asia.[71]

In 2012 it was estimated that, using a poverty line of $1.25 a day, 1.2 billion people lived in poverty.[72] Given the current economic model, built on GDP, it would take 100 years to bring the world's poorest up to the poverty line of $1.25 a day.[73] UNICEF estimates half the world's children (or 1.1 billion) live in poverty.[74] The World Bank forecasted in 2015 that 702.1 million people were living in extreme poverty, down from 1.75 billion in 1990.[75] Extreme poverty is observed in all parts of the world, including developed economies.[76][77] Of the 2015 population, about 347.1 million people (35.2%) lived in Sub-Saharan Africa and 231.3 million (13.5%) lived in South Asia. According to the World Bank, between 1990 and 2015, the percentage of the world's population living in extreme poverty fell from 37.1% to 9.6%, falling below 10% for the first time.[78] During the 2013 to 2015 period, the World Bank reported that extreme poverty fell from 11% to 10%, however they also noted that the rate of decline had slowed by nearly half from the 25 year average with parts of sub-saharan Africa returning to early 2000 levels.[79][80] The World Bank attributed this to increasing violence following the Arab Spring, population increases in Sub-Saharan Africa, and general African inflationary pressures and economic malaise were the primary drivers for this slow down.[81][82] Many wealthy nations have seen an increase in relative poverty rates ever since the Great Recession, in particular among children from impoverished families who often reside in substandard housing and find educational opportunities out of reach.[83] It has been argued by some academics that the neoliberal policies promoted by global financial institutions such as the IMF and the World Bank are actually exacerbating both inequality and poverty.[84][85]

In East Asia the World Bank reported that "The poverty headcount rate at the $2-a-day level is estimated to have fallen to about 27 percent [in 2007], down from 29.5 percent in 2006 and 69 percent in 1990."[86] The People's Republic of China accounts for over three quarters of global poverty reduction from 1990 to 2005, which according to the World Bank is "historically unprecedented".[87] China accounted for nearly half of all extreme poverty in 1990.[88]

In Sub-Saharan Africa extreme poverty went up from 41% in 1981 to 46% in 2001,[89] which combined with growing population increased the number of people living in extreme poverty from 231 million to 318 million.[90] Statistics of 2018 shows population living in extreme conditions has declined by more than 1 billion in the last 25 years. As per the report published by the world bank on 19 September 2018 world poverty falls below 750 million.[91]

In the early 1990s some of the transition economies of Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia experienced a sharp drop in income.[92] The collapse of the Soviet Union resulted in large declines in GDP per capita, of about 30 to 35% between 1990 and the through year of 1998 (when it was at its minimum). As a result, poverty rates tripled,[93] excess mortality increased,[94] and life expectancy declined.[95] Russian President Boris Yeltsin's IMF-backed rapid privatization and austerity policies resulted in unemployment rising to double digits and half the Russian population falling into destitution by the early to mid 1990s.[96] By 1999, during the peak of the poverty crisis, 191 million people were living on less than $5.50 a day.[97] In subsequent years as per capita incomes recovered the poverty rate dropped from 31.4% of the population to 19.6%.[98][99] The average post-communist country had returned to 1989 levels of per-capita GDP by 2005,[100] although as of 2015 some are still far behind that.[101] According to the World Bank in 2014, around 80 million people were still living on less than $5.00 a day.[97]

World Bank data shows that the percentage of the population living in households with consumption or income per person below the poverty line has decreased in each region of the world except Middle East and North Africa since 1990:[102][103]

In July 2023, a group of over 200 economists from 67 countries, including Jayati Ghosh, Joseph Stiglitz and Thomas Piketty, sent a letter to the United Nations secretary general António Guterres and World Bank president Ajay Banga warning that "extreme poverty and extreme wealth have risen sharply and simultaneously for the first time in 25 years."[104] In 2024, Oxfam reported that roughly five billion people have become poorer since 2020 and warned that current trends could postpone global poverty eradication for 229 years.[105]

Region $2.15 per day[106]
1981 1990 2000 2010 2018 2019
East Asia and Pacific 83.5% 65.8% 39.5% 13.3% 1.6% 1.2%
Europe and Central Asia 9.1% 4.1% 2.3% 2.3%
Latin America and the Caribbean 15.1% 16.8% 13.5% 6.4% 4.3% 4.3%
Middle East and North Africa 6.5% 3.5% 1.9% 9.6%
South Asia 58% 49.8% 26% 10.1% 8.6%
Sub-Saharan Africa 53.8% 56.5% 42.2% 35.4% 34.9%
World 43.6% 37.9% 29.3% 16.3% 9% 8.5%

Characteristics[edit]

Life expectancy has been increasing and converging for most of the world. Sub-Saharan Africa has recently seen a decline, partly related to the AIDS epidemic. Graph shows the years 1950–2005.

The effects of poverty may also be causes as listed above, thus creating a "poverty cycle" operating across multiple levels, individual, local, national and global.

A Somali boy receiving treatment for malnourishment at a health facility

Health[edit]

Life expectancy, 2016

One-third of deaths around the world—some 18 million people a year or 50,000 per day—are due to poverty-related causes. People living in developing nations, among them women and children, are over represented among the global poor and these effects of severe poverty.[107][108][109] Those living in poverty suffer disproportionately from hunger or even starvation and disease, as well as lower life expectancy.[110][111] According to the World Health Organization, hunger and malnutrition are the single gravest threats to the world's public health and malnutrition is by far the biggest contributor to child mortality, present in half of all cases.[112]

Almost 90% of maternal deaths during childbirth occur in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, compared to less than 1% in the developed world.[113] Those who live in poverty have also been shown to have a far greater likelihood of having or incurring a disability within their lifetime.[114] Infectious diseases such as malaria and tuberculosis can perpetuate poverty by diverting health and economic resources from investment and productivity; malaria decreases GDP growth by up to 1.3% in some developing nations and AIDS decreases African growth by 0.3–1.5% annually.[115][116][117]

Studies have shown that poverty impedes cognitive function although some of these findings could not be replicated in follow-up studies.[118] One hypothesised mechanism is that financial worries put a severe burden on one's mental resources so that they are no longer fully available for solving complicated problems. The reduced capability for problem solving can lead to suboptimal decisions and further perpetuate poverty.[119] Many other pathways from poverty to compromised cognitive capacities have been noted, from poor nutrition and environmental toxins to the effects of stress on parenting behavior, all of which lead to suboptimal psychological development.[120][121] Neuroscientists have documented the impact of poverty on brain structure and function throughout the lifespan.[122]

Infectious diseases continue to blight the lives of the poor across the world. 36.8 million people are living with HIV/AIDS, with 954,492 deaths in 2017.[123]

Poor people often are more prone to severe diseases due to the lack of health care, and due to living in non-optimal conditions. Among the poor, girls tend to suffer even more due to gender discrimination. Economic stability is paramount in a poor household; otherwise they go in an endless loop of negative income trying to treat diseases. Often when a person in a poor household falls ill it is up to the family members to take care of them due to limited access to health care and lack of health insurance. The household members often have to give up their income or stop seeking further education to tend to the sick member. There is a greater opportunity cost imposed on the poor to tend to someone compared to someone with better financial stability.[124] Increased access to healthcare and improved health outcomes help prevent individuals from falling into poverty due to medical expenses.[125][126]

Hunger[edit]

Percentage of population suffering from hunger, World Food Programme, 2020

It is estimated that 1.02 billion people go to bed hungry every night.[127] According to the Global Hunger Index, Sub-Saharan Africa had the highest child malnutrition rate of the world's regions over the 2001–2006 period.[128]

Poor people spend a greater portion of their budgets on food than wealthy people and, as a result, they can be particularly vulnerable to increases in food prices. For example, in late 2007, increases in the price of grains[129] led to food riots in some countries.[130][131][132] Threats to the supply of food may also be caused by drought and the water crisis.[133] Intensive farming often leads to a vicious cycle of exhaustion of soil fertility and decline of agricultural yields.[134] Approximately 40% of the world's agricultural land is seriously degraded.[135][136] Goal 2 of the Sustainable Development Goals is the elimination of hunger and undernutrition by 2030.[137]

Mental health[edit]

A Venezuelan eating from garbage during the crisis in Bolivarian Venezuela

A psychological study has been conducted by four scientists during inaugural Convention of Psychological Science. The results find that people who thrive with financial stability or fall under low socioeconomic status (SES) tend to perform worse cognitively due to external pressure imposed upon them. The research found that stressors such as low income, inadequate health care, discrimination, and exposure to criminal activities all contribute to mental disorders. This study also found that children exposed to poverty-stricken environments have slower cognitive thinking.[138] It is seen that children perform better under the care of their parents and that children tend to adopt speaking language at a younger age. Since being in poverty from childhood is more harmful than it is for an adult, it is seen that children in poor households tend to fall behind in certain cognitive abilities compared to other average families.[139]

For a child to grow up emotionally healthy, the children under three need "A strong, reliable primary caregiver who provides consistent and unconditional love, guidance, and support. Safe, predictable, stable environments. Ten to 20 hours each week of harmonious, reciprocal interactions. This process, known as attunement, is most crucial during the first 6–24 months of infants' lives and helps them develop a wider range of healthy emotions, including gratitude, forgiveness, and empathy. Enrichment through personalized, increasingly complex activities".Template:Fix In one survey, 67% of children from disadvantaged inner cities said they had witnessed a serious assault, and 33% reported witnessing a homicide.[140] 51% of fifth graders from New Orleans (median income for a household: $27,133) have been found to be victims of violence, compared to 32% in Washington, DC (mean income for a household: $40,127).[141] Studies have shown that poverty changes the personalities of children who live in it. The Great Smoky Mountains Study was a ten-year study that was able to demonstrate this. During the study, about one-quarter of the families saw a dramatic and unexpected increase in income. The study showed that among these children, instances of behavioral and emotional disorders decreased, and conscientiousness and agreeableness increased.[142]

Education[edit]

Research has found that there is a high risk of educational underachievement for children who are from low-income housing circumstances. This is often a process that begins in primary school. Instruction in the US educational system, as well as in most other countries, tends to be geared towards those students who come from more advantaged backgrounds. As a result, children in poverty are at a higher risk than advantaged children for retention in their grade, special deleterious placements during the school's hours and not completing their high school education.[143] Advantage breeds advantage.[144] There are many explanations for why students tend to drop out of school. One is the conditions in which they attend school. Schools in poverty-stricken areas have conditions that hinder children from learning in a safe environment. Researchers have developed a name for areas like this: an urban war zone is a poor, crime-laden district in which deteriorated, violent, even warlike conditions and underfunded, largely ineffective schools promote inferior academic performance, including irregular attendance and disruptive or non-compliant classroom behavior.[145] Because of poverty, "Students from low-income families are 2.4 times more likely to drop out than middle-income kids, and over 10 times more likely than high-income peers to drop out."[146]

For children with low resources, the risk factors are similar to others such as juvenile delinquency rates, higher levels of teenage pregnancy, and economic dependency upon their low-income parent or parents.[143] Families and society who submit low levels of investment in the education and development of less fortunate children end up with less favorable results for the children who see a life of parental employment reduction and low wages. Higher rates of early childbearing with all the connected risks to family, health and well-being are major issues to address since education from preschool to high school is identifiably meaningful in a life.[143]

Out of school child

Poverty often drastically affects children's success in school. A child's "home activities, preferences, mannerisms" must align with the world and in the cases that they do not do these, students are at a disadvantage in the school and, most importantly, the classroom.[147] Therefore, it is safe to state that children who live at or below the poverty level will have far less success educationally than children who live above the poverty line. Poor children have a great deal less healthcare and this ultimately results in many absences from school. Additionally, poor children are much more likely to suffer from hunger, fatigue, irritability, headaches, ear infections, flu, and colds.[147] These illnesses could potentially restrict a student's focus and concentration.[148]

In general, the interaction of gender with poverty or location tends to work to the disadvantage of girls in poorer countries with low completion rates and social expectations that they marry early, and to the disadvantage of boys in richer countries with high completion rates but social expectations that they enter the labour force early.[149] At the primary education level, most countries with a completion rate below 60% exhibit gender disparity at girls' expense, particularly poor and rural girls. In Mauritania, the adjusted gender parity index is 0.86 on average, but only 0.63 for the poorest 20%, while there is parity among the richest 20%. In countries with completion rates between 60% and 80%, gender disparity is generally smaller, but disparity at the expense of poor girls is especially marked in Cameroon, Nigeria and Yemen. Exceptions in the opposite direction are observed in countries with pastoralist economies that rely on boys' labour, such as the Kingdom of Eswatini, Lesotho and Namibia.[149]

Shelter[edit]

Homeless family in Kolkata, India
Street child in Bangladesh. Aiding relatives financially unable to but willing to take in orphans is found to be more effective by cost and welfare than orphanages.[150]

The right to housing is argued to be a human right.[151][152] Higher density and lower cost housing affords low-income families and first-time homebuyers with more and less expensive shelter opportunities, reducing economic inequality.[153][154]

The geographic concentration of poverty is argued to be a factor in entrenching poverty. William J. Wilson's "concentration and isolation" hypothesis states that the economic difficulties of the very poorest African Americans are compounded by the fact that as the better-off African Americans move out, the poorest are more and more concentrated, having only other very poor people as neighbors. This concentration causes social isolation, Wilson suggests, because the very poor are now isolated from access to the job networks, role models, institutions, and other connections that might help them escape poverty.[155] Gentrification means converting an aging neighborhood into a more affluent one, as by remodeling homes. Landlords then increase rent on newly renovated real estate; the poor people cannot afford to pay high rent, and may need to leave their neighborhood to find affordable housing.[156] The poor also get more access to income and services, while studies suggest poor residents living in gentrifying neighbourhoods are actually less likely to move than poor residents of non-gentrifying areas.[157]

Poverty increases the risk of homelessness.[158] Slum-dwellers, who make up a third of the world's urban population, live in a poverty no better, if not worse, than rural people, who are the traditional focus of the poverty in the developing world, according to a report by the United Nations.[159]

There are over 100 million street children worldwide.[160] Most of the children living in institutions around the world have a surviving parent or close relative, and they most commonly entered orphanages because of poverty.[150] It is speculated that, flush with money, for-profit orphanages are increasing and push for children to join even though demographic data show that even the poorest extended families usually take in children whose parents have died.[150] Many child advocates maintain that this can harm children's development by separating them from their families and that it would be more effective and cheaper to aid close relatives who want to take in the orphans.[150]

Utilities[edit]

Affordable household toilets near Jaipur, Rajasthan

The poor tend to pay more for access to utilities and ensuring the availability of water, sanitation, energy, and telecommunication services such as broadband internet service[161] help in reducing poverty in general.[162][163]

Water and sanitation[edit]

As of 2012, 2.5 billion people lack access to sanitation services and 15% practice open defecation.[164] Even while providing latrines is a challenge, people still do not use them even when available. Bangladesh had half the GDP per capita of India but has a lower mortality from diarrhea than India or the world average, with diarrhea deaths declining by 90% since the 1990s. By strategically providing pit latrines to the poorest, charities in Bangladesh sparked a cultural change as those better off perceived it as an issue of status to not use one. The vast majority of the latrines built were then not from charities but by villagers themselves.[165]

Water utility subsidies tend to subsidize water consumption by those connected to the supply grid, which is typically skewed towards the richer and urban segment of the population and those outside informal housing. As a result of heavy consumption subsidies, the price of water decreases to the extent that only 30%, on average, of the supplying costs in developing countries is covered.[166][167] This results in a lack of incentive to maintain delivery systems, leading to losses from leaks annually that are enough for 200 million people.[166][168] This also leads to a lack of incentive to invest in expanding the network, resulting in much of the poor population being unconnected to the network. Instead, the poor buy water from water vendors for, on average, about 5 to 16 times the metered price.[166][169] However, subsidies for laying new connections to the network rather than for consumption have shown more promise for the poor.[167]

Energy[edit]

Template:Excerpt

Financial services[edit]

Template:Seealso For low-income individuals and families, access to credit can be limited, predatory, or both, making it difficult to find the financial resources they need to invest in their futures.[170][171]

Prejudice and exploitation[edit]

The urban poor buy water from water vendors for, on average, about 5 to 16 times the metered price.[166]

Cultural factors, such as discrimination of various kinds, can negatively affect productivity such as age discrimination, stereotyping,[172] discrimination against people with physical disability,[173] gender discrimination, racial discrimination, and caste discrimination. Children are more than twice as likely to live in poverty as adults.[174] Women are the group suffering from the highest rate of poverty after children, in what is referred to as the feminization of poverty. In addition, the fact that women are more likely to be caregivers, regardless of income level, to either the generations before or after them, exacerbates the burdens of their poverty.[175] Those in poverty have increased chances of incurring a disability which leads to a cycle where disability and poverty are mutually reinforcing.

Max Weber and some schools of modernization theory suggest that cultural values could affect economic success.[176][177] However, researchersTemplate:Who have gathered evidence that suggest that values are not as deeply ingrained and that changing economic opportunities explain most of the movement into and out of poverty, as opposed to shifts in values.[178] A 2018 report on poverty in the United States by UN special rapporteur Philip Alston asserts that caricatured narratives about the rich and the poor (that "the rich are industrious, entrepreneurial, patriotic and the drivers of economic success" while "the poor are wasters, losers and scammers") are largely inaccurate, as "the poor are overwhelmingly those born into poverty, or those thrust there by circumstances largely beyond their control, such as physical or mental disabilities, divorce, family breakdown, illness, old age, unlivable wages or discrimination in the job market."[179] Societal perception of people experiencing economic difficulty has historically appeared as a conceptual dichotomy: the "good" poor (people who are physically impaired, disabled, the "ill and incurable," the elderly, pregnant women, children) vs. the "bad" poor (able-bodied, "valid" adults, most often male).[180]

According to experts, many women become victims of trafficking, the most common form of which is prostitution, as a means of survival and economic desperation.[181] Deterioration of living conditions can often compel children to abandon school to contribute to the family income, putting them at risk of being exploited.[182] For example, in Zimbabwe, a number of girls are turning to sex in return for food to survive because of the increasing poverty.[183] According to studies, as poverty decreases there will be fewer and fewer instances of violence.[184]

Poverty reduction Template:Anchor[edit]

Template:Duplication

Logo of the Sustainable Development Goal 1 of the United Nations, to "end poverty in all its forms, everywhere" by 2030[185]

Various poverty reduction strategies are broadly categorized based on whether they make more of the basic human needs available or whether they increase the disposable income needed to purchase those needs.[186] Some strategies such as building roads can both bring access to various basic needs, such as fertilizer or healthcare from urban areas, as well as increase incomes, by bringing better access to urban markets.[187][188]

Reducing relative poverty would also involve reducing inequality. Oxfam, among others,[189] has called for an international movement to end extreme wealth concentration arguing that the concentration of resources in the hands of the top 1% depresses economic activity and makes life harder for everyone else—particularly those at the bottom of the economic ladder.[190][191] And they say that the gains of the world's billionaires in 2017, which amounted to $762 billion, were enough to end extreme global poverty seven times over.[192] Methods to reduce inequality and relative poverty include progressive taxation, which involves increasing tax rates on high-income earners,[193][194] wealth taxes, which involve taxing a portion of an individual's net worth above a certain threshold,[195][196][197] reducing payroll taxes, which are taxes on employees and employers and reducing this provides workers greater take-home pay and allows employers to spend more on wages and salaries,[198][199][200] and increasing the labor share, which is the proportion of business income paid as wages and salaries instead of allocated to shareholders as profit.[201][202]

Increasing the supply of basic needs[edit]

Improving technology[edit]

Spreading fertilizer on a field of rapeseed near Barton-upon-Humber, England

Agricultural technologies such as nitrogen fertilizers, pesticides, new seed varieties and new irrigation methods have dramatically reduced food shortages in modern times by boosting yields past previous constraints.[203] Before the Industrial Revolution, poverty had been mostly accepted as inevitable as economies produced little, making wealth scarce.[204] Geoffrey Parker wrote that "In Antwerp and Lyon, two of the largest cities in western Europe, by 1600 three-quarters of the total population were too poor to pay taxes, and therefore likely to need relief in times of crisis."[205] The initial industrial revolution led to high economic growth and eliminated mass absolute poverty in what is now considered the developed world.[206] Mass production of goods in places such as rapidly industrializing China has made what were once considered luxuries, such as vehicles and computers, inexpensive and thus accessible to many who were otherwise too poor to afford them.[207][208]

Other than technology, advancements in sciences such as medicine help provide basic needs better. For example, Sri Lanka had a maternal mortality rate of 2% in the 1930s, higher than any nation today, but reduced it to 0.5–0.6% in the 1950s and to 0.6% in 2006 while spending less each year on maternal health because it learned what worked and what did not.[209][210] Knowledge on the cost effectiveness of healthcare interventions can be elusive and educational measures have been made to disseminate what works, such as the Copenhagen Consensus.[211] Cheap water filters and promoting hand washing are some of the most cost effective health interventions and can cut deaths from diarrhea and pneumonia.[212][213] Fortification with micronutrients was ranked the most cost effective aid strategy by the Copenhagen Consensus.[214] For example, iodised salt costs 2 to 3 cents per person a year while even moderate iodine deficiency in pregnancy shaves off 10 to 15 IQ points.[215]

State funding[edit]

Hardwood surgical tables are commonplace in rural Nigerian clinics.

Certain basic needs are argued to be better provided by the state. Universal healthcare can reduce the overall cost of providing healthcare by having a single payer negotiating with healthcare providers and minimizing administrative costs.[125][126] It is also argued that subsidizing essential goods such as fuel is less efficient in helping the poor than providing that same money as income grants to the poor.[216]

Government revenue can be diverted away from basic services by corruption.[217][218] Funds from aid and natural resources are often sent by government individuals for money laundering to overseas banks which insist on bank secrecy, instead of spending on the poor.[219] A Global Witness report asked for more action from Western banks as they have proved capable of stanching the flow of funds linked to terrorism.[219]

Illicit capital flight, such as corporate tax avoidance,[220] from the developing world is estimated at ten times the size of aid it receives and twice the debt service it pays,[221] with one estimate that most of Africa would be developed if the taxes owed were paid.[222] About 60 per cent of illicit capital flight from Africa is from transfer mispricing, where a subsidiary in a developing nation sells to another subsidiary or shell company in a tax haven at an artificially low price to pay less tax.[223] An African Union report estimates that about 30% of sub-Saharan Africa's GDP has been moved to tax havens.[224] Solutions include corporate "country-by-country reporting" where corporations disclose activities in each country and thereby prohibit the use of tax havens where no effective economic activity occurs.[223]

Developing countries' debt service to banks and governments from richer countries can constrain government spending on the poor.[225] For example, Zambia spent 40% of its total budget to repay foreign debt, and only 7% for basic state services in 1997.[226] One of the proposed ways to help poor countries has been debt relief. Zambia began offering services, such as free health care even while overwhelming the health care infrastructure, because of savings that resulted from a 2005 round of debt relief.[227] Since that round of debt relief, private creditors accounted for an increasing share of poor countries' debt service obligations. This complicated efforts to renegotiate easier terms for borrowers during crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic because the multiple private creditors involved say they have a fiduciary obligation to their clients such as the pension funds.[228][229]

The World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, as primary holders of developing countries' debt, attach structural adjustment conditionalities in return for loans which are generally geared toward loan repayment with austerity measures such as the elimination of state subsidies and the privatization of state services. For example, the World Bank presses poor nations to eliminate subsidies for fertilizer even while many farmers cannot afford them at market prices.[230] In Malawi, almost 5 million of its 13 million people used to need emergency food aid but after the government changed policy and subsidies for fertilizer and seed were introduced, farmers produced record-breaking corn harvests in 2006 and 2007 as Malawi became a major food exporter.[230] A major proportion of aid from donor nations is tied, mandating that a receiving nation spend on products and expertise originating only from the donor country.[231] US law requires food aid be spent on buying food at home, instead of where the hungry live, and, as a result, half of what is spent is used on transport.[232]

Distressed securities funds, also known as vulture funds, buy up the debt of poor nations cheaply and then sue countries for the full value of the debt plus interest which can be ten or 100 times what they paid.[233] They may pursue any companies which do business with their target country to force them to pay to the fund instead.[233] Considerable resources are diverted on costly court cases. For example, a court in Jersey ordered the Democratic Republic of the Congo to pay an American speculator $100 million in 2010.[233] Now, the UK, Isle of Man and Jersey have banned such payments.[233]

A family planning placard in Ethiopia. It shows some negative effects of having too many children.

Improving access to available basic needs[edit]

Even with new products, such as better seeds, or greater volumes of them, such as industrial production, the poor still require access to these products. Improving road and transportation infrastructure helps solve this major bottleneck. In Africa, it costs more to move fertilizer from an African seaport 100 kilometres (60 mi) inland than to ship it from the United States to Africa because of sparse, low-quality roads, leading to fertilizer costs two to six times the world average.[234] Microfranchising models such as door-to-door distributors who earn commission-based income or Coca-Cola's successful distribution system[235][236] are used to disseminate basic needs to remote areas for below market prices.[237][238]

The loss of basic needs providers emigrating from impoverished countries has a damaging effect.[239] As of 2004, there were more Ethiopia-trained doctors living in Chicago than in Ethiopia[240] and this often leaves inadequately less skilled doctors to remain in their home countries.[241] Proposals to mitigate the problem include compulsory government service for graduates of public medical and nursing schools[239] and promoting medical tourism so that health care personnel have more incentive to practice in their home countries.[242] Telehealth is the use of telecommunication technologies to deliver health services. For remotes communities in Alaska, telehealth has been found to reduce travel costs alone for the state by $13 million in 2021[243] and, according to one study, reduced the life expectancy gap between whites and American Indian population in Alaska from eight to five years.[244]

Preventing overpopulation[edit]

Map of countries and territories by fertility rate as of 2020

Poverty and lack of access to birth control can lead to population increases that put pressure on local economies and access to resources, amplifying other economic inequality and creating increase poverty.[245][90][246] Better education for both men and women, and more control of their lives, reduces population growth due to family planning.[247][248] According to United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), those who receive better education can earn money for their lives, thereby strengthening economic security.[249]

Increasing personal income[edit]

The following are strategies used or proposed to increase personal incomes among the poor. Raising farm incomes is described as the core of the antipoverty effort as three-quarters of the poor today are farmers.[250] Estimates show that growth in the agricultural productivity of small farmers is, on average, at least twice as effective in benefiting the poorest half of a country's population as growth generated in nonagricultural sectors.[251]

Income grants[edit]

Afghan girl begging in Kabul

A guaranteed minimum income ensures that every citizen will be able to purchase a desired level of basic needs. One method is through a basic income (or negative income tax), which is a system of social security, that periodically provides each citizen, rich or poor, with a sum of money that is sufficient to live on.[252] Studies of large cash-transfer programs in Ethiopia, Kenya, and Malawi show that the programs can be effective in increasing consumption, schooling, and nutrition, whether they are tied to such conditions or not.[253][254][255] Employment subsidies are conditional subsidies that go to those already employed and this has shown to have little effect on those at the lowest income levels.[198][256][257] Proponents argue that a basic income is more economically efficient than a minimum wage and unemployment benefits, as the minimum wage effectively imposes a high marginal tax on employers, causing losses in efficiency. In 1968, Paul Samuelson, John Kenneth Galbraith and another 1,200 economists signed a document calling for the US Congress to introduce a system of income guarantees.[258] Winners of the Nobel Prize in Economics, with often diverse political convictions, who support a basic income include Herbert A. Simon,[259] Friedrich Hayek,[260] Robert Solow,[259] Milton Friedman,[261] Jan Tinbergen,[259] James Tobin[262][263][264] and James Meade.[259]

Income grants are argued to be vastly more efficient in extending basic needs to the poor than subsidizing supplies whose effectiveness in poverty alleviation is diluted by the non-poor who enjoy the same subsidized prices.[216] With cars and other appliances, the wealthiest 20% of Egypt uses about 93% of the country's fuel subsidies.[265] In some countries, fuel subsidies are a larger part of the budget than health and education.[265][266] A 2008 study concluded that the money spent on in-kind transfers in India in a year could lift all India's poor out of poverty for that year if transferred directly.[267] The primary obstacle argued against direct cash transfers is the impractically for poor countries of such large and direct transfers. In practice, payments determined by complex iris scanning are used by war-torn Democratic Republic of Congo and Afghanistan,[268] while India is phasing out its fuel subsidies in favor of direct transfers.[269] Additionally, in aid models, the famine relief model increasingly used by aid groups calls for giving cash or cash vouchers to the hungry to pay local farmers instead of buying food from donor countries, often required by law, as it wastes money on transport costs.[270][271]

Economic freedoms[edit]

Corruption often leads to many civil services being treated by governments as employment agencies to loyal supporters[272] and so it could mean going through 20 procedures, paying $2,696 in fees, and waiting 82 business days to start a business in Bolivia, while in Canada it takes two days, two registration procedures, and $280 to do the same.[273] Such costly barriers favor big firms at the expense of small enterprises, where most jobs are created.[274] Often, businesses have to bribe government officials even for routine activities, which is, in effect, a tax on business.[275] Noted reductions in poverty in recent decades has occurred in China and India mostly as a result of the abandonment of collective farming in China and the ending of the central planning model known as the License Raj in India.[276][277][278]

The World Bank concludes that governments and feudal elites extending to the poor the right to the land that they live and use are 'the key to reducing poverty' citing that land rights greatly increase poor people's wealth, in some cases doubling it.[279] Providing secure tenure to land ownership creates incentives to improve the land and thus improves the welfare of the poor.[280] It is argued that those in power have an incentive to not secure property rights as they are able to then more easily take land or any small business that does well to their supporters.[281]

Greater access to markets brings more income to the poor. Road infrastructure has a direct impact on poverty.[282][283] Additionally, migration from poorer countries resulted in $328 billion sent from richer to poorer countries in 2010, more than double the $120 billion in official aid flows from OECD members. In 2011, India got $52 billion from its diaspora, more than it took in foreign direct investment.[284]

Financial services[edit]

Information and communication technologies for development help to fight poverty.

Microloans, made famous by the Grameen Bank, is where small amounts of money are loaned to farmers or villages, mostly women, who can then obtain physical capital to increase their economic rewards. However, microlending has been criticized for making hyperprofits off the poor even from its founder, Muhammad Yunus,[285] and in India, Arundhati Roy asserts that some 250,000 debt-ridden farmers have been driven to suicide.[286][287][288]

Those in poverty place overwhelming importance on having a safe place to save money, much more so than receiving loans.[289] Additionally, a large part of microfinance loans are spent not on investments but on products that would usually be paid by a checking or savings account.[289] Microsavings are designs to make savings products available for the poor, who make small deposits. Mobile banking uses the wide availability of mobile phones to address the problem of the heavy regulation and costly maintenance of saving accounts.[289] This usually involves a network of agents of mostly shopkeepers, instead of bank branches, would take deposits in cash and translate these onto a virtual account on customers' phones. Cash transfers can be done between phones and issued back in cash with a small commission, making remittances safer.[290]

Education and vocational training[edit]

Early childhood education through USAID in Ziway, Ethiopia

Free education through public education or charitable organizations rather than through tuition, from early childhood education through the tertiary level provides children from low-income families who may not otherwise have the financial resources with better job prospects and higher earnings and promotes social mobility.[291][292][293][294] Job training and vocational education programs that target training in technical skills in specific industries or occupations that are in high demand can reduce poverty and wealth concentration.[295][296]

Strategies to provide education cost effectively include deworming children, which costs about 50 cents per child per year and reduces non-attendance from anemia, illness and malnutrition, while being only a twenty-fifth as expensive as increasing school attendance by constructing schools.[297] Schoolgirl absenteeism could be cut in half by simply providing free sanitary towels.[298] Paying for school meals is argued to be an efficient strategy in increasing school enrollment, reducing absenteeism and increasing student attention.[299]

Desirable actions such as enrolling children in school or receiving vaccinations can be encouraged by a form of aid known as conditional cash transfers.[300] In Mexico, for example, dropout rates of 16- to 19-year-olds in rural area dropped by 20% and children gained half an inch in height.[301] Initial fears that the program would encourage families to stay at home rather than work to collect benefits have proven to be unfounded. Instead, there is less excuse for neglectful behavior as, for example, children stopped begging on the streets instead of going to school because it could result in suspension from the program.[301]

Antipoverty institutions[edit]

United Nations[edit]

In 2015 all UN Member States adopted the 17 Sustainable Development Goals as part of the Post-2015 Development Agenda, which sought to create a future global development framework to succeed the Millennium Development Goals, which were goals set in 2000 and were meant to be achieved by 2015.[302] Most targets are to be achieved by 2030, although some have no end date.[303] Goal 1 is to "end poverty in all its forms everywhere".[304] It aims to eliminate extreme poverty for all people measured by daily wages less than $1.25 and at least half the total number of men, women, and children living in poverty. In addition, social protection systems must be established at the national level and equal access to economic resources must be ensured.[305] Strategies have to be developed at the national, regional and international levels to support the eradication of poverty.[306]

Development banks[edit]

A development financial institution, also known as a development bank, is a financial institution that provides risk capital for economic development projects on a non-commercial basis. They are often established and owned by governments to finance projects that would otherwise not be able to get financing from commercial lenders. These include international financial institutions such as the World Bank, which is the largest development bank.

Private sector[edit]

The private sector includes nonprofit nongovernmental organizations as well as for-profit institutions involved in combating poverty. In recent decades, the number of nongovernmental organizations has increased dramatically. The High level forums on aid effectiveness that was coordinated by the OECD found that this leads to fragmentation where too many agencies were financing too many small projects using too many different procedures and that the civil service of the donor countries were overstretched producing reports for each.[307]

The Poverty industrial complex refers to for-profit companies taking over roles previously held by government agencies. The incentive for profit in such companies has been argued to interfere with efficiently providing the needed services.

Perspectives[edit]

Economic theories[edit]

Data shows substantial social segregation correlating with economic income groups.[308] However, social connectedness to people of higher income levels is a strong predictor of upward income mobility.[308]

The cause of poverty is a highly ideologically charged subject, as different causes point to different remedies. Very broadly speaking, the socialist tradition locates the roots of poverty in problems of distribution and the use of the means of production as capital benefiting individuals, and calls for redistribution of wealth as the solution, whereas the neoliberal school of thought holds that creating conditions for profitable private investment is the solution. Neoliberal think tanks have received extensive funding,[309] and the ability to apply many of their ideas in highly indebted countries in the global South as a condition for receiving emergency loans from the International Monetary Fund.

The existence of inequality is in part due to a set of self-reinforcing behaviors that all together constitute one aspect of the cycle of poverty. These behaviors, in addition to unfavorable, external circumstances, also explain the existence of the Matthew effect, which not only exacerbates existing inequality, but is more likely to make it multigenerational. Widespread, multigenerational poverty is an important contributor to civil unrest and political instability.[310] For example, Raghuram G. Rajan, former governor of the Reserve Bank of India and former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, has blamed the ever-widening gulf between the rich and the poor, especially in the US, to be one of the main fault lines which caused the financial institutions to pump money into subprime mortgages—on political behest, as a palliative and not a remedy, for poverty—causing the financial crisis of 2007–2009. In Rajan's view the main cause of the increasing gap between high income and low income earners was lack of equal access to higher education for the latter.[311]

A data based scientific empirical research, which studied the impact of dynastic politics on the level of poverty of the provinces, found a positive correlation between dynastic politics and poverty; i.e. the higher proportion of dynastic politicians in power in a province leads to higher poverty rate.[312] There is significant evidence that these political dynasties use their political dominance over their respective regions to enrich themselves, using methods such as graft or outright bribery of legislators.[313]

Most economic historians believe that throughout most of human history, extreme poverty was the norm for roughly 90% of the population, and only with the emergence of industrialization in the 19th century were the masses of people lifted out of it.[314]Template:R This narrative is advanced by, among others, Martin Ravallion,[315] Nicholas Kristof,[316] and Steven Pinker.[317]

Some academics, including Dylan Sullivan and Jason Hickel have challenged this contemporary mainstream narrative on poverty, arguing that extreme poverty was not the norm throughout human history, but emerged during "periods of severe social and economic dislocation", including high European feudalism and the apex of the Roman Empire, and that it expanded significantly after 1500 with the emergence of colonialism and the beginnings of capitalism, stating that "the expansion of the capitalist world-system caused a dramatic and prolonged process of impoverishment on a scale unparalleled in recorded history." Sullivan and Hickel assert that only with the rise of anti-colonial and socialist political movements in the 20th century did human welfare begin to see significant improvement.[314] However, all scholars and intellectuals, including Hickel, agree that the incomes of the poorest people in the world have increased since 1981.[318] Nevertheless, Sullivan and Hickel argue that poverty persists under contemporary global capitalism (in spite of it being highly productive) because masses of working people are cut off from common land and resources, have no ownership or control over the means of production, and have their labor power "appropriated by a ruling class or an external imperial power," thereby maintaining extreme inequality.[314]

Marian L. Tupy, a senior fellow of the Cato Institute, a right-libertarian think tank, criticized Hickel's claim that people before industrialization lived well without a lot of monetary income, stating that "The evidence from contemporary accounts and academic research" shows that "Compared to today, Western European living standards prior to industrialization were miserably low.", that "poverty was widespread and it was precisely the onset of industrialization and global trade … which led to poverty alleviation first in the West and then in the Rest."[319] and that both Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, while advocating for socialism, recognized that the capitalist system developing around them had improved people's material conditions.[319]

Environmentalism[edit]

A sewage treatment plant that uses solar energy, located at Santuari de Lluc monastery, Majorca

Important studies such as the Brundtland Report concluded that poverty causes environmental degradation, while other theories like environmentalism of the poor conclude that the global poor may be the most important force for sustainability.[320] Either way, the poor suffer most from environmental degradation caused by reckless exploitation of natural resources by the rich.[321] This unfair distribution of environmental burdens and benefits has generated the global environmental justice movement.[322]

A report published in 2013 by the World Bank, with support from the Climate & Development Knowledge Network, found that climate change was likely to hinder future attempts to reduce poverty. The report presented the likely impacts of present day, 2 °C and 4 °C warming on agricultural production, water resources, coastal ecosystems and cities across Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia and South East Asia. The impacts of a temperature rise of 2 °C included: regular food shortages in Sub-Saharan Africa; shifting rain patterns in South Asia leaving some parts under water and others without enough water for power generation, irrigation or drinking; degradation and loss of reefs in South East Asia, resulting in reduced fish stocks; and coastal communities and cities more vulnerable to increasingly violent storms.[323] In 2016, a UN report claimed that by 2030, an additional 122 million more people could be driven to extreme poverty because of climate change.[324]

Global warming can also lead to a deficiency in water availability; with higher temperatures and CO2 levels, plants consume more water leaving less for people. By consequence, water in rivers and streams will decline in the mid-altitude regions like Central Asia, Europe and North America. And if CO2 levels continue to rise, or even remain the same, droughts will be happening much faster and will be lasting longer. According to a 2016 study led by Professor of Water Management, Arjen Hoekstra, four billion people are affected by water scarcity at least one month per year.[325]

Spirituality[edit]

St. Francis of Assisi renounces his worldly goods in a painting attributed to Giotto di Bondone.

Among some individuals, poverty is considered a necessary or desirable condition, which must be embraced to reach certain spiritual, moral, or intellectual states. Poverty is often understood to be an essential element of renunciation in religions such as Buddhism, Hinduism (only for monks, not for lay persons) and Jainism, whilst in Christianity, in particular Roman Catholicism, it is one of the evangelical counsels. The main aim of giving up things of the materialistic world is to withdraw oneself from sensual pleasures (as they are considered illusionary and only temporary in some religions—such as the concept of dunya in Islam). This self-invited poverty (or giving up pleasures) is different from the one caused by economic imbalance.

Some Christian communities, such as the Simple Way, the Bruderhof, and the Amish value voluntary poverty;[326] some even take a vow of poverty, similar to that of the traditional Catholic orders, in order to live a more complete life of discipleship.[327]

Benedict XVI distinguished "poverty chosen" (the poverty of spirit proposed by Jesus), and "poverty to be fought" (unjust and imposed poverty). He considered that the moderation implied in the former favors solidarity, and is a necessary condition so as to fight effectively to eradicate the abuse of the latter.[328]

As it was indicated above the reduction of poverty results from religion, but also can result from solidarity.[329]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

Citations[edit]

  1. "Ending Poverty". United Nations. Archived from the original on 9 September 2020. Retrieved 22 September 2020.
  2. 2.0 2.1 "Poverty | United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization". www.unesco.org. Archived from the original on 9 December 2019. Retrieved 4 November 2015.
  3. "Fragile and Conflict-Affected Countries and Situations", The World Bank Group A to Z 2016, The World Bank, pp. 60a–62, 7 October 2015, doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-0484-7_fragile_and_conflict_affected, ISBN 978-1-4648-0484-7
  4. B. Milanovic, Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization (Harvard Univ. Press, 2016).
  5. dpicampaigns. "Goal 1: End poverty in all its forms everywhere". United Nations Sustainable Development. Retrieved 9 October 2021.
  6. "Indicators of Poverty & Hunger" (PDF). United Nations. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 June 2011. Retrieved 16 January 2022.
  7. "Poverty and Inequality Analysis". worldbank.org. Archived from the original on 3 June 2011. Retrieved 27 May 2011.
  8. 10.0 10.1
  9. "Poverty headcount ratio at $1.90 a day (2011 PPP) (% of population) | Data". data.worldbank.org. Archived from the original on 19 January 2021. Retrieved 23 July 2020.
  10. UN declaration at World Summit on Social Development in Copenhagen in 1995
  11. "Poverty". World Bank. Archived from the original on 30 August 2004. Retrieved 23 April 2010.
  12. 15.0 15.1 15.2
  13. Ravallion, Martin; Chen, Shaohua & Sangraula, Prem (2008). "Dollar a Day Revisited" (PDF). The World Bank. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 August 2012. Retrieved 8 August 2012.
  14. Template:Cite report
  15. ""The Bank uses an updated international poverty line of US $1.90 a day, which incorporates new information on differences in the cost of living across countries (the PPP exchange rates)."". Archived from the original on 3 January 2016. Retrieved 29 October 2015.
  16. WDI. "Societal poverty a global measure of relative poverty". Archived from the original on 3 March 2021. Retrieved 2 February 2021.
  17. International Food Policy Research Institute, The World's Most Deprived. Characteristics and Causes of Extreme Poverty and Hunger , Washington: IFPRI Oct 2007
  18. "Poverty Definitions". US Census Bureau. 2011. Archived from the original on 6 February 2016. Retrieved 20 December 2017.
  19. 23.0 23.1 "World Bank's $1.25/day poverty measure – countering the latest criticisms". The World Bank. 2010. Archived from the original on 10 December 2014. Retrieved 4 December 2014.
  20. "New Progress in Development-oriented Poverty Reduction Program for Rural China (1,274 yuan per year = US$ 0.55 per day)". The Government of China. 2011. Archived from the original on 14 July 2014. Retrieved 8 August 2012.
  21. "Did we really reduce extreme poverty by half in 30 years?". @politifact. Archived from the original on 26 May 2019. Retrieved 25 April 2019.
  22. "Four Reasons to Question the Official 'Poverty Eradication' Story of 2015". Archived from the original on 13 September 2016. Retrieved 11 August 2016.
  23. "Poverty Measures" (PDF). The World Bank. 2009. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 July 2012. Retrieved 8 August 2012.
  24. Lipton, Michael (1986), 'Seasonality and ultra-poverty', Sussex, IDS Bulletin 17.3
  25. 33.0 33.1 Adamson, Peter (2012). "Measuring child poverty: New league tables of child poverty in the world's rich countries – UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre Report Card – number 10" (PDF). Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 June 2013. Retrieved 19 June 2013.
  26. Template:Cite report
  27. Template:Cite report
  28. Template:Cite report
  29. Template:Cite report
  30. "Growing unequal? Income distribution and poverty in OECD countries" (PDF). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2008. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 March 2016. Retrieved 19 February 2016.
  31. Template:Cite report
  32. "Child Poverty". Ottawa: Conference Board of Canada. 2013. Archived from the original on 4 June 2013. Retrieved 19 June 2013.
  33. Marx, Ive; van den Bosch, Karel. "How Poverty Differs From Inequality, On Poverty Management in an Enlarged EU Context: Conventional and Alternative Approaches" (PDF). ec.europa.eu. Antwerp: Centre for Social Policy. Archived (PDF) from the original on 3 October 2018.
  34. "GINI index (World Bank estimate) | Data". data.worldbank.org. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 23 July 2020.
  35. "Levels and Trends in Child Mortality" (PDF). UNICEF, World Health Organization, The World Bank and UN Population Division. 2011. Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 August 2012. Retrieved 9 August 2012.
  36. H Silver, 1994, social exclusion and social solidarity, in International Labour Review, 133 5–6
  37. G Simmel, The poor, Social Problems 1965 13
  38. "A Glossary for Social Epidemiology". World Health Organization. March 2002. Archived from the original on 29 June 2011. Retrieved 21 June 2011.
  39. "Journal of Poverty". Journal of Poverty. Archived from the original on 12 May 2012. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  40. 56.0 56.1
  41. "The economic lives of the poor". MIT. October 2006. Archived from the original on 23 May 2013. Retrieved 1 March 2013.
  42. Template:Cite report
  43. Template:Cite report
  44. Chen, Shaohua & Ravallioniz, Martin (August 2008). "The Developing World Is Poorer Than We Thought, But No Less Successful in the Fight against Poverty" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 April 2012. Retrieved 9 August 2012.
  45. 65.0 65.1 "The World Bank, 2007, Understanding Poverty". Web.worldbank.org. 19 April 2005. Archived from the original on 7 November 2019. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  46. 66.0 66.1
  47. Origins of the Organic Agriculture Debate By Thomas R. DeGregori, 2008, P.128
  48. Economic Inequality and Poverty International Perspectives Edited by Lars Osberg, 2017, P.71
  49. "World Bank Group – International Development, Poverty, & Sustainability". World Bank. Retrieved 19 October 2023.
  50. "How Have the World's Poorest Fared Since the Early 1980s?" Table 3, p. 28". worldbank.org. Archived from the original on 10 March 2007. Retrieved 28 May 2011.
  51. Ravallion, Martin. "How long will it take to lift one billion people out of poverty?." The World Bank Research Observer 28.2 (2013): 139.
  52. Jason Hickel (30 March 2015). It will take 100 years for the world's poorest people to earn $1.25 a day . The Guardian. Retrieved 31 March 2015.
  53. Madu, Ernest C. "Investment and Development Will Secure the Rights of the Child". Archived from the original on 13 April 2014. Retrieved 12 April 2014.
  54. Template:Cite report
  55. "World Bank Sees Progress Against Extreme Poverty, But Flags Vulnerabilities". The World bank. 29 February 2012. Archived from the original on 23 November 2012. Retrieved 8 August 2012.
  56. "Poverty and Equity – India, 2010 World Bank Country Profile". Povertydata.worldbank.org. 30 March 2012. Archived from the original on 25 November 2017. Retrieved 26 July 2013.
  57. "World Bank Forecasts Global Poverty to Fall Below 10% for First Time; Major Hurdles Remain in Goal to End Poverty by 2030". Worldbank.org. 4 October 2015. Archived from the original on 3 January 2016. Retrieved 6 January 2016.
  58. Charlton, Emma (20 November 2018). "Why rich countries are seeing more poverty". World Economic Forum. Archived from the original on 18 February 2019. Retrieved 17 February 2019.
  59. "East Asia Remains Robust Despite US Slow Down". worldbank.org. Archived from the original on 22 March 2011. Retrieved 27 May 2011.
  60. 90.0 90.1
  61. "Worldbank.org reference". Web.worldbank.org. 19 April 2005. Archived from the original on 7 November 2019. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  62. 97.0 97.1
  63. "World Bank, Data and Statistics, WDI, GDF, & ADI Online Databases". World Bank. Archived from the original on 16 April 2010. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  64. "World Bank, 2007, Povcalnet Poverty Data". World Bank. Archived from the original on 4 December 2010. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  65. The data can be replicated using World Bank 2007 Human Development Indicator regional tables, and using the default poverty line of $32.74 per month at 1993 PPP.
  66. "Poverty headcount ratio at $2.15 a day (2017 PPP) (% of population) – East Asia & Pacific, Sub-Saharan Africa, Europe & Central Asia, Middle East & North Africa, South Asia, Latin America & Caribbean, World". World Bank Open Data. Retrieved 1 June 2023.
  67. "Human Development Report" (PDF). United Nations Development Programme. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 April 2015. Retrieved 15 April 2015.
  68. "The World Health Report, World Health Organization (See annex table 2)". Who.int. Archived from the original on 26 January 2011. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  69. "Disability – Disability: Overview". Go.worldbank.org. 28 March 2013. Archived from the original on 16 May 2012. Retrieved 26 July 2013.
  70. "Economic costs of AIDS". Globalpolicy.org. 23 July 2003. Archived from the original on 23 March 2010. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  71. "Poverty Issues Dominate WHO Regional Meeting". Wpro.who.int. Archived from the original on 3 April 2011. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  72. "Prevalence, new cases and deaths from HIV/AIDS". Our World in Data. Archived from the original on 20 April 2020. Retrieved 27 April 2020.
  73. 125.0 125.1 Blumenthal, David (9 September 2014), "Do Health Care Costs Fuel Economic Inequality in the United States?", www.commonwealthfund.org, retrieved 22 February 2023
  74. 126.0 126.1
  75. "1.02 billion people hungry". fao.org. 19 June 2009. Archived from the original on 17 November 2012. Retrieved 21 June 2011.
  76. "2008 Global Hunger Index Key Findings & Facts". 2008. Archived from the original on 19 October 2017. Retrieved 20 September 2010.
  77. "Vanishing Himalayan Glaciers Threaten a Billion". Planetark.com. 5 June 2007. Archived from the original on 29 April 2016. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  78. Exploitation and Over-exploitation in Societies Past and Present, Brigitta Benzing, Bernd Herrmann
  79. "The Earth Is Shrinking: Advancing Deserts and Rising Seas Squeezing Civilization". Earth-policy.org. Archived from the original on 10 August 2009. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  80. Martin. "Goal 2: Zero Hunger". United Nations Sustainable Development. Archived from the original on 10 December 2019. Retrieved 25 April 2019.
  81. Citing:
  82. Citing: ; and, Richters, J.E., & Martinez, P. (1993).
  83. "The remarkable thing that happens to poor kids when you give their parents a little money". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 9 October 2015. Retrieved 8 October 2015.
  84. 143.0 143.1 143.2 Huston, A. C. (1991). Children in Poverty: Child Development and Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  85. Raghuram G. Rajan (2012). Fault Lines: How Hidden Fractures Still Threaten the World Economy. Published by: Collins Business
  86. Garbarino, J., Dubrow, N., Kostelny, K., & Pardo, C. (1992). Children in Danger: Coping with the Consequences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Print.
  87. "Cause and Effect: The High Cost of High School Dropouts". The Huffington Post. 30 November 2014. Archived from the original on 30 May 2016. Retrieved 21 April 2016.
  88. 147.0 147.1 Solley, Bobbie A. (2005). When Poverty's Children Write: Celebrating Strengths, Transforming Lives. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, Inc.
  89. Jensen, Eric. "Teaching with Poverty in Mind". ASCD. Archived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 11 November 2013.
  90. 149.0 149.1
  91. 150.0 150.1 150.2 150.3
  92. Desmond, Matthew (2016). Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City. Crown Books. Template:ISBN?Template:Fix
  93. Bratt, Rachel G. (Editor), Stone, Michael E. (Editor), Hartman, Chester (Editor). 2006. A Right to Housing: Foundation for a New Social Agenda. Temple University Press.Template:ISBN?Template:Fix
  94. Wilson, William J. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  95. Moss, Jeremiah. 24 July 2018. Vanishing New York: How a Great City Lost Its Soul. HarperCollins Publishers.
  96. "Street Children". Portal.unesco.org. Archived from the original on 21 May 2008. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  97. WHO and UNICEF Progress on Drinking-water and Sanitation: 2012 Update, WHO, Geneva and UNICEF, New York, p. 2
  98. 166.0 166.1 166.2 166.3 "Trickle-Down Economics". foreignpolicy.com. 5 December 2011. Archived from the original on 2 May 2015. Retrieved 18 December 2014.
  99. 167.0 167.1
  100. Lua error in Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers at line 1368: attempt to compare nil with number.
  101. "Ending Poverty in Community (EPIC)". Usccb.org. Archived from the original on 9 March 2011. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  102. Filmer, D. (2008), "Disability, poverty, and schooling in developing countries: results from 14 household surveys", The World Bank Economic Review, 22(1), pp. 141–163
  103. "Child poverty". www.unicef.org. Retrieved 21 October 2021.
  104. "Gender Lens on Poverty" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 June 2016. Retrieved 3 December 2019.
  105. Moore, Wilbert. 1974. Social Change. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  106. Parsons, Talcott. 1966. Societies: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  107. Kerbo, Harold. 2006. Social Stratification and Inequality: Class Conflict in Historical, Comparative, and Global Perspective, 6th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  108. Brodiez-Dolino, Axelle (7 June 2021). "Perceptions of People in Poverty Throughout History". ATD Fourth World (Online written interview.). Archived from the original on 8 June 2021. Retrieved 8 June 2021.
  109. "Experts encourage action against sex trafficking". .voanews.com. 15 May 2009. Archived from the original on 1 May 2011. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  110. "Child sex boom fueled by poverty". Globalpost.com. Archived from the original on 1 November 2010. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  111. United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313 )
  112. Hernández, Diego (1 August 2017). "Public transport, well-being and inequality: coverage and affordability in the city of Montevideo" (PDF). CEPAL Review.
  113. "Inequality and Poverty – OECD". Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 23 February 2023.
  114. Amaglobeli, David; Thevenot, Celine (March 2022), Tackling Inequality on All Fronts, International Monetary Fund, retrieved 22 February 2023
  115. Terreblanche, Sampie (January 2018). "A Wealth Tax for South Africa" (PDF). University of Witwatersrand. SCIS Working Paper. Retrieved 24 February 2023. wealth tax ... income could be used to set up a restitution fund to help alleviate the worst poverty.
  116. Mattauch, Linus (31 January 2019), "Reducing wealth inequality through wealth taxes without compromising economic growth", Oxford Martin School, retrieved 22 February 2023
  117. 198.0 198.1
  118. Jean-Paul, Fitoussi (2000), "Payroll tax reductions for the low paid" (PDF), OECD Economic Studies, vol. 2000/II, no. 31, pp. 115–131
  119. Giovannoni, Olivier (30 January 2010), Functional Distribution of Income, Inequality and the Incidence of Poverty: Stylized Facts and the Role of Macroeconomic Policy (PDF), University of Texas Inequality Project, retrieved 25 February 2023
  120. "Forgotten benefactor of humanity". Theatlantic.com. January 1997. Archived from the original on 4 January 2010. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  121. Poverty (sociology). britannica.com. Archived from the original on 15 March 2010. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  122. Geoffrey Parker (2001). "Europe in crisis, 1598–1648 ". Wiley–Blackwell. p. 11. ISBN 978-0-631-22028-2
  123. Great Depression , Encyclopædia Britannica
  124. "Disease Control Priorities Project". dcp2.org. Archived from the original on 23 June 2011. Retrieved 21 June 2011.
  125. Prabhat, Jha. "Benefits and costs of the health targets for the post-2015 development agenda". copenhageconsensus.com. Copenhagen Consensus Center. Archived from the original on 11 November 2016. Retrieved 10 November 2016.
  126. 216.0 216.1
  127. "Anti-Corruption Climate Change: it started in Nigeria". United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. 13 November 2007. Archived from the original on 22 April 2011. Retrieved 21 June 2011.
  128. "Nigeria: the Hidden Cost of Corruption". Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). 14 April 2009. Archived from the original on 23 October 2011. Retrieved 21 June 2011.
  129. 219.0 219.1
  130. José Antonio Ocampo and Magdalena Sepúlveda Carmona (30 September 2015). Tax avoidance by corporations is out of control. The United Nations must step in . The Guardian. Retrieved 30 September 2015.
  131. 223.0 223.1
  132. The World Bank and International Monetary Fund. 2001. Heavily Indebted Poor Countries, Progress Report. Retrieved from Worldbank.org .
  133. "Third World Debt". worldcentric.org. Archived from the original on 27 May 2011. Retrieved 27 May 2011.
  134. 230.0 230.1
  135. "Tied aid strangling nations, says UN". ispnews.net. Archived from the original on 23 December 2010. Retrieved 27 May 2011.
  136. "Let them eat micronutrients". Newsweek. 20 September 2008. Archived from the original on 17 July 2009. Retrieved 27 May 2011.
  137. 233.0 233.1 233.2 233.3
  138. 239.0 239.1 "Philippine Medical Brain Drain Leaves Public Health System in Crisis". voanews.com. 3 May 2006. Archived from the original on 30 January 2012. Retrieved 27 May 2011.
  139. "Medicaid reform improves access to healthcare for Alaska Natives". www.alaskajournal.com. Retrieved 15 June 2023.
  140. "Population and poverty". www.unfpa.org. Archived from the original on 21 May 2019. Retrieved 11 February 2019.
  141. "Population growth driving climate change, poverty: experts ". Agence France-Presse. 21 September 2009.
  142. World Bank. 2001. Engendering Development – Through Gender Equality in Right, Resources and Voice. New York: Oxford University Press.
  143. "Population and Poverty". 2014. Archived from the original on 21 December 2014. Retrieved 5 January 2015.
  144. "Climate Change: Bangladesh facing the challenge". The World Bank. 8 September 2008. Archived from the original on 18 January 2012. Retrieved 5 July 2011.
  145. Wright, Erik Olin (14 February 2017), "Can the universal basic income solve global inequalities?", en.unesco.org, retrieved 22 February 2023
  146. Economists' Statement on Guaranteed Annual Income, 1/15/1968 – April 18, 1969 folder, General Correspondence Series, Papers of John Kenneth Galbraith, John F. Kennedy Presidential Library. Cited in: Jyotsna Sreenivasan, "Poverty and the Government in America: A Historical Encyclopedia." (Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, 2009), p. 269
  147. 259.0 259.1 259.2 259.3
  148. "Is a Negative Income Tax Practical?", James Tobin, Joseph A. Pechman, and Peter M. Mieszkowski, Yale Law Journal 77 (1967): 1–27.
  149. Fettig, David (2011). "Interview with James Tobin – The Region – Publications & Papers | The Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis". minneapolisfed.org. Archived from the original on 15 October 2011. Retrieved 25 October 2011. I would pursue my recommendations of years ago for a negative income tax.
  150. 265.0 265.1 "How to end fossil fuel subsidies without hurting the poor". Aljazeera. 11 December 2012. Archived from the original on 14 December 2012. Retrieved 23 January 2013.
  151. Kapur, Devesh; Mukhopadhyay, Subramanian (12 April 2008). "More for the Poor and Less for and by the State: The Case for Direct Cash Transfers" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 May 2013. Retrieved 23 January 2013.
  152. "Biometrics, Identity and Development". Center for Global Development. 14 October 2010. Archived from the original on 26 September 2013. Retrieved 6 April 2013.
  153. "Cash roll-out to help hunger hot spots". World Food Program. 8 December 2008. Archived from the original on 12 February 2009. Retrieved 21 June 2011.
  154. "Ending mass poverty". cato.org. Archived from the original on 24 May 2011. Retrieved 27 May 2011.
  155. Krugman, Paul, and Robin Wells. Macroeconomics. 2. New York City: Worth Publishers, 2009. Print.
  156. "Poor Little Rich Country". foreignpolicy.com. 24 June 2011. Archived from the original on 28 June 2011. Retrieved 5 July 2011.
  157. "Global Competitiveness Report 2006, World Economic Forum". weforum.org. Archived from the original on 19 June 2008. Retrieved 28 May 2011.
  158. "Infrastructure and Poverty Reduction: Cross-country Evidence". abdi.org. Archived from the original on 26 September 2011. Retrieved 28 May 2011.
  159. Excerpt From "Capitalism: A Ghost Story" By Arundhati Roy . Democracy Now! Retrieved 27 May 2014.
  160. 289.0 289.1 289.2
  161. King, Mary (8 December 2021). "A Strong Economic Case for Federal Investment in Universal Preschool". Institute for Policy Studies. Retrieved 24 February 2023.
  162. García, Rosa M. (February 2019). "Debt-Free College: Principles for Prioritizing Low-Income Students" (PDF). Center for Law and Social Policy. Center for Law and Social Policy. Retrieved 24 February 2023.
  163. Jon Marcus; Holly K. Hacker (17 December 2015), "The rich-poor divide on America's college campuses is getting wider, fast", The Hechinger Report, retrieved 22 February 2023
  164. 301.0 301.1
  165. "SDG Indicators - Global indicator framework for the Sustainable Development Goals and targets of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development". United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD). Retrieved 6 August 2020.
  166. "Goal 1: End poverty in all its forms everywhere".
  167. "2030 Development agenda: ILO Focus targets (The 2030 development agenda)". www.ilo.org.
  168. "Goal 1 | Department of Economic and Social Affairs".
  169. 308.0 308.1 Data from Charted in
  170. "Fragile states – poverty, instability and violence". www.eda.admin.ch. Archived from the original on 15 June 2018. Retrieved 15 June 2018.
  171. "What is wrong with political dynasties?". GMA News Online. October 2012. Archived from the original on 26 November 2015. Retrieved 8 November 2015.
  172. 314.0 314.1 314.2
  173. Matthews, Dylan (12 February 2019). "Bill Gates tweeted out a chart and sparked a huge debate about global poverty". Vox. Retrieved 15 June 2023.
  174. 319.0 319.1 "The Romantic Idea of a Plentiful Past Is Pure Fantasy". HumanProgress. 14 February 2019. Retrieved 22 July 2023.
  175. "Anantha Duraiappah (1996). Poverty and Environmental Degradation: a Literature Review and Analysis CREED Working Paper Series No 8 International Institute for Environment and Development, London. Retrieved on June 27, 2016" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 January 2016. Retrieved 27 June 2016.
  176. REPORT: Warmer world will keep millions of people trapped in poverty. Climate & Development Knowledge Network. Retrieved 31 July 2013.
  177. "Thirsty future ahead as climate change explodes plant growth". Science. 4 November 2019. Archived from the original on 1 November 2020. Retrieved 30 November 2020.
  178. Premier (18 July 2019). "Meet the Bruderhof: Our exclusive peek inside a modern Christian utopia". Premier Christianity. Archived from the original on 27 September 2019. Retrieved 26 October 2019.
  179. "S. Adamiak, D. Walczak, Catholic social teaching and social solidarity in the context of social security, Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, Vol 3, No 1, p. 17". Archived from the original on 16 April 2014. Retrieved 19 December 2014.

Sources[edit]

Further reading[edit]

  • Allen, Robert C. 2020. "Poverty and the Labor Market: Today and Yesterday. " Annual Review of Economomics.
  • Half of the world's poor live in just 5 countries Roy Katayama & Divinshi Wadha. World Bank Blogs.
  • Atkinson, Anthony. Poverty in Europe 1998
  • Banerjee, Abhijit & Esther Duflo, Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty (New York: PublicAffairs, 2011)
  • Bergmann, Barbara. "Deciding Who's Poor" , Dollars & Sense, March/April 2000
  • Betson, David M. & Warlick, Jennifer L. "Alternative Historical Trends in Poverty." American Economic Review 88:348–51. 1998.
  • Brady, David "Rethinking the Sociological Measurement of Poverty" Social Forces 81#3 2003, pp. 715–751 Online in Project Muse.
  • Buhmann, Brigitte, et al. 1988. "Equivalence Scales, Well-Being, Inequality, and Poverty: Sensitivity Estimates Across Ten Countries Using the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) Database." Review of Income and Wealth 34:115–142.
  • Danziger, Sheldon H. & Weinberg, Daniel H. "The Historical Record: Trends in Family Income, Inequality, and Poverty." pp. 18–50 in Confronting Poverty: Prescriptions for Change, edited by Sheldon H. Danziger, Gary D. Sandefur, and Daniel. H. Weinberg. Russell Sage Foundation. 1994.
  • Firebaugh, Glenn. "Empirics of World Income Inequality." American Journal of Sociology (2000) 104:1597–1630. in JSTOR
  • Gans, Herbert J., "The Uses of Poverty: The Poor Pay All" , Social Policy, July/August 1971: pp. 20–24
  • Gordon, David M. Theories of Poverty and Underemployment: Orthodox, Radical, and Dual Labor Market Perspectives. 1972.
  • Haveman, Robert H. Poverty Policy and Poverty Research. University of Wisconsin Press 1987 ISBN 978-0-299-11150-2
  • Haymes, Stephen, Maria Vidal de Haymes and Reuben Miller (eds). The Routledge Handbook of Poverty in the United States . Routledge, 2015. ISBN 978-0-415-67344-0.
  • Iceland, John Poverty in America: a handbook University of California Press, 2003
  • Lee, Dwight R. (2008). "Wealth and Poverty". In Hamowy, Ronald (ed.). The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; Cato Institute. pp. 537–539. doi:10.4135/9781412965811.n326. ISBN 978-1-4129-6580-4. LCCN 2008009151.
  • McEwan, Joanne, and Pamela Sharpe, eds. Accommodating Poverty: The Housing and Living Arrangements of the English Poor, c. 1600–1850 (Palgrave Macmillan; 2010) 292 pages; scholarly studies of rural and urban poor, as well as vagrants, unmarried mothers, and almshouse dwellers.
  • Paugam, Serge. "Poverty and Social Exclusion: a sociological view." pp. 41–62 in The Future of European Welfare, edited by Martin Rhodes and Yves Meny, 1998.
  • Prashad, Vijay. The Poorer Nations: A Possible History of the Global South. Verso Books, June 2014. ISBN 978-1-78168-158-9
  • Prashad, Vijay. "Making Poverty History". Jacobin. 10 November 2014.
  • Pressman, Steven, Poverty in America: an annotated bibliography. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press, 1994 ISBN 978-0-8108-2833-9
  • Robinson, Marilynne, "Is Poverty Necessary? An idea that won't go away", Harper's Magazine, vol. 338, no. 2029 (June 2019), pp. 25–33. "To bring up the subject of providing a better life is to lean too far left, to flirt with socialism.... 'Why... do wages tend to a minimum which will give but a bare living?' A short answer would be: because they can.... Insofar as the public is barred from taking a central role in society, we lose wisdom to stealth, stupidity, parochialism."
  • Rothman, David J., (editor). The Almshouse Experience (Poverty U.S.A.: the Historical Record). New York: Arno Press, 1971. ISBN 978-0-405-03092-5Reprint of Report of the committee appointed by the Board of Guardians of the Poor of the City and Districts of Philadelphia to visit the cities of Baltimore, New York, Providence, Boston, and Salem (published in Philadelphia, 1827); Report of the Massachusetts General Court's Committee on Pauper Laws (published in [Boston?], 1821); and the 1824 Report of the New York Secretary of State on the relief and settlement of the poor (from the 24th annual report of the New York State Board of Charities, 1901).
  • Roy, Arundhati, Capitalism: A Ghost Story, Haymarket Books, 2014, ISBN 978-1-60846-385-5.
  • Sen, Amartya, Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1981.
  • Sen, Amartya, Development as Freedom, New York, Knopf, 1999.
  • Smeeding, Timothy M., O'Higgins, Michael & Rainwater, Lee. Poverty, Inequality and Income Distribution in Comparative Perspective. Urban Institute Press 1990.
  • Smith, Stephen C., Ending Global Poverty: a guide to what works, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005
  • Wilson, Richard & Pickett, Kate. The Spirit Level, London: Allen Lane, 2009
  • World Bank: "Can South Asia End Poverty in a Generation?"
  • World Bank, "World Development Report 2004: Making Services Work For Poor People", 2004

External links[edit]

Template:Wikiversity

Template:Clear Template:Poverty Template:Deprivation Indicators Template:Social class Template:Africa topic Template:Americas topic Template:Asia topic Template:Europe topic Template:Oceania topic Template:Effective altruism

Discuss this page