Concerns Raised Over UK Asylum Seekers Utilizing Public Funds For Gambling

Asylum candidates are utilizing taxpayer handouts to fund their gaming habits. Pre-paid cards offered to spend for essentials including food and clothes are being utilized in betting venues such as bookies, amusement games and even casinos, Home Office information shows.


In the in 2015, approximately 6,537 asylum candidates have used the government-issued cards a minimum of when for gaming. The shock figures were released under flexibility of information laws to the PoliticsHome website. They calls for an immediate clampdown to avoid the abuse of taxpayers' cash by asylum seekers, consisting of many who entered the nation unlawfully. Last night, the Home Office verified it had introduced a questions into the scandal.


It came as Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp (visualized) described the 'stunning' figures as 'an insult to taxpayers'. 'These individuals have actually illegally entered this nation without needing to - France is safe and nobody needs to flee from there,' he stated. 'The British taxpayer has put them up in hotels and now they slap us in the face by utilizing the money they are provided to money betting. These illegal immigrants plainly don't require the money they are offered if they are wasting it at gambling establishments and games. Labour has lost control of our borders with record numbers for prohibited immigrants crossing the Channel this year. The number in asylum hotels has increased since the election and now we discover of this insult to British taxpayers. Everyone unlawfully crossing the Channel must be right away gotten rid of to their country of origin or a safe third nation in order to prevent these crossings.'


So-called Aspen cards are provided to asylum hunters while they wait to have their claims handled - a process that can take months, or even years. Those in self-catered accommodation get ₤ 49.18 on the card weekly to pay for 'clothing and shoes, non-prescription medicines, travel, food, non-alcoholic drinks, toiletries, laundry, toilet tissue and communications'. The cards are currently issued to around 80,000 individuals who are waiting for a decision on whether they have a legitimate claim to stay in the UK. Many are residing in hotels at the taxpayers' expenditure. The Home Office last night stated: 'The Home Office have actually begun an investigation into making use of Aspen cards. The Office has a legal commitment to support asylum seekers, consisting of any dependants, who would otherwise be destitute.'


The Office has the ability to track where the cards are utilized but does not block payments for specific kinds of deal. The figures reveal that considerable varieties of asylum hunters are now utilizing the cards to bet. The Home Office figures break down the number of asylum seekers tried to use their cards in betting places every week. They do not tape-record the number of times each specific attempted to utilize their card in that week. They show that an average of 125 asylum applicants a week used their cards with 'gambling-related merchants'.


Dozens utilized the cards every week, with 177 using them to gamble in Christmas week when lots of places are closed. The figures peaked at 227 in one week at the end of November last year. The Aspen cards use a chip and pin system so can not be used for contactless payments or online. An Office source insisted it was 'not possible' to use the cards to straight put a bet. However, the information is comprehended to include withdrawals made from atm inside places such as amusement games and casinos - where gambling is the sole focus.


Paul Bristow (envisioned), Tory mayor of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, suggested betting by asylum hunters at the taxpayers' cost may even be fuelling the growth of the market. He informed PoliticsHome: 'Peterborough has actually seen a big increase in the number of gambling establishments and video gaming centres, and a big boost in males who've gotten here on small boats. It's not unusual to see the extremely exact same males in some of the establishments on a Thursday, Friday or Saturday night. There's something going on here. Questions need to be asked. It would be definitely wrong if they were using money provided to them by British taxpayers to squander on betting.'


Reform UK's deputy leader Richard Tice stated: 'This revelation, combined with migrants working unlawfully, reveals that the Home Office is incapable of policing the illegal migrant population. This is a slap in the face to industrious British taxpayers who are struggling to make ends satisfy.' The discoveries are most likely to sustain concerns about the surge in small boat crossings under Labour. Around 20,000 people crossed the Channel illegally in the very first half of this year - an increase of 50 per cent on the previous year. Public anger is already mounting over the policy of accommodating 10s of thousands of asylum candidates in hotels throughout the country, with angry protests appearing in current days in Epping, in Essex, Diss in Norfolk and Canary Wharf, in London.


The Aspen cards were presented to provide fundamental subsistence for asylum applicants who are not legally permitted to work or claim advantages most of the times. But ministers are increasingly concerned at proof of unlawful working by asylum candidates, which may permit some to treat their taxpayer-funded handouts as pin cash. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has ordered a clampdown on unlawful working this week following a string of reports about asylum applicants making money in the gig economy with delivery companies such as Deliveroo and Just Eat. In some cases, delivery bikes bearing the companies' logo designs have been seen parked outside asylum hotels.


Firms will be issued with information on the places of asylum hotels and ordered to stop using workers who appear to have actually been operating from there. But specialists question whether this will work. Emma Brooksbank, immigration partner at law company Freeths, said the strategy was likely to show ineffective. 'It will not be hard for unlawful employees to bypass this constraint and prevent detection. Companies like these gig economy operators are mostly uncontrolled, and as such the usual right to work penalties of ₤ 60,000 per prohibited worker do not use. They have no real reward to tidy up their act.'


FranceThe Home OfficeChannel 4