The Daily Telegraph Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.Anti-spam check. Do not fill this in! == Political stance == ''The Daily Telegraph'' is politically conservative and has endorsed the [[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservative Party]] at every UK general election since 1945.<ref name="slate">{{cite news |last=Curtis |first=Bryan |url=http://www.slate.com/id/2152196/ |title=Strange days at the Daily Telegraph |work=Slate |date=25 October 2006 |access-date=2 May 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100125141303/http://www.slate.com/id/2152196/ |archive-date=25 January 2010 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |date= 4 May 2010 |title= Newspaper support in UK general elections |url= https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2010/may/04/general-election-newspaper-support |work= The Guardian |access-date= 22 November 2021 |archive-date= 1 August 2013 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20130801141949/http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2010/may/04/general-election-newspaper-support |url-status= live }}</ref> The personal links between the paper's editors and the leadership of the [[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservative Party]], along with the paper's generally [[Right-wing politics|right-wing]] stance and influence over Conservative activists, have led the paper commonly to be referred to, especially in ''[[Private Eye]]'', as the ''Torygraph''.<ref name="slate" /> When the Barclay brothers purchased the [[Telegraph Media Group|Telegraph Group]] for around Β£665 million in late June 2004, Sir [[David and Frederick Barclay|David Barclay]] suggested that ''The Daily Telegraph'' might no longer be the "house newspaper" of the [[Conservative Party (UK)|Conservatives]] in the future. In an interview with ''[[The Guardian]]'', he said: "Where the government are right we shall support them". The editorial board endorsed the Conservative Party in the 2005 general election.{{citation needed|date=October 2020}} During the [[2014 Scottish independence referendum]], the paper supported the [[Better Together (campaign)|Better Together]] 'No' Campaign.<ref name="insecure">{{cite news |last=Booker |first=Christopher |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/11314342/The-insecure-Scots-have-turned-in-on-themselves-and-against-us.html |title=The insecure Scots have turned in on themselves and against us |work=The Daily Telegraph |date=27 December 2014 |access-date=31 December 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141229214800/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/11314342/The-insecure-Scots-have-turned-in-on-themselves-and-against-us.html |archive-date=29 December 2014 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="destruction">{{cite news |last=Anderson |first=Bruce |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scotland/11314336/England-must-be-resolute-and-save-the-Scots-from-self-destruction.html |title=England must be resolute and save the Scots from self-destruction |work=The Daily Telegraph |date=27 December 2014 |access-date=31 December 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141231052536/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scotland/11314336/England-must-be-resolute-and-save-the-Scots-from-self-destruction.html |archive-date=31 December 2014 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="behaviour">{{cite news |last=Hodges |first=Dan |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scottish-independence/11296689/England-wont-put-up-with-Scotlands-behaviour-for-long.html |title=England won't put up with Scotlands behaviour for long |work=The Daily Telegraph |date=16 December 2014 |access-date=31 December 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141227024731/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scottish-independence/11296689/England-wont-put-up-with-Scotlands-behaviour-for-long.html |archive-date=27 December 2014 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="indulged">{{cite news |last=McTernan |first=John |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scotland/8730902/Tell-the-truth-Scotland-has-been-indulged-for-too-long.html |title=Tell the Truth Scotland has been indulged for too long |work=The Daily Telegraph |date=30 August 2011 |access-date=10 January 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150208124611/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scotland/8730902/Tell-the-truth-Scotland-has-been-indulged-for-too-long.html |archive-date=8 February 2015 |url-status=live }}</ref> [[Alex Salmond]], the former leader of the SNP, called ''The Telegraph'' "extreme" on ''[[Question Time (TV programme)|Question Time]]'' in September 2015.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Sparrow|first1=Andrew|title=John McDonnell apologises profusely on Question Time for comments praising IRA β as it happened|url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/live/2015/sep/17/john-mcdonnell-and-alex-salmond-on-bbc-question-time|newspaper=The Guardian|date=17 September 2015|access-date=18 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150918015044/http://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/live/2015/sep/17/john-mcdonnell-and-alex-salmond-on-bbc-question-time|archive-date=18 September 2015|url-status=live}}</ref> In the [[2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum]], it endorsed voting to leave the EU.<ref>{{cite news |date= 20 June 2016 |title= Vote leave to benefit from a world of opportunity |url= https://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/2016/06/20/vote-leave-to-benefit-from-a-world-of-opportunity/ |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/2016/06/20/vote-leave-to-benefit-from-a-world-of-opportunity/ |archive-date=11 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |work= The Daily Telegraph |access-date= 22 November 2021}}{{cbignore}}</ref> During the [[2019 Conservative Party leadership election|2019 Conservative leadership election]], ''The Daily Telegraph'' endorsed their former columnist [[Boris Johnson]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/2019/07/04/boris-johnson-mr-brexit-elect-pm-give-chance-deliver/|title=Boris Johnson is Mr Brexit. Elect him PM and give him a chance to deliver it|date=4 July 2019|work=The Telegraph|access-date=29 September 2019|language=en-GB|issn=0307-1235|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190815172440/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/2019/07/04/boris-johnson-mr-brexit-elect-pm-give-chance-deliver/|archive-date=15 August 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2019, former columnist [[Graham Norton]], who had left the paper in late 2018, said "about a year before I left, it took a turn" and criticised it for "toxic" political stances, namely for a piece defending [[Supreme Court of the United States|US Supreme Court]] then-nominee [[Brett Kavanaugh]] and for being "a mouthpiece for Boris Johnson" whose columns were allegedly published with "no fact-checking at all".<ref>{{cite web |last1=Waterson |first1=Jim |title='Toxic' Telegraph made me feel nauseous, says Graham Norton |url=https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2019/oct/07/toxic-telegraph-made-me-feel-nauseous-says-graham-norton |website=[[The Guardian]] |access-date=10 November 2019 |date=7 October 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191026122439/https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2019/oct/07/toxic-telegraph-made-me-feel-nauseous-says-graham-norton |archive-date=26 October 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref> It was fined Β£30,000 in 2015 for "sending an unsolicited email to hundreds of thousands of its subscribers, urging them to vote for the Conservatives."<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.politics.co.uk/news/2015/12/21/telegraph-fined-30-000-for-vote-tory-email|title=Telegraph fined Β£30,000 for 'vote Tory' email|last=Bienkov|first=Adam|date=21 December 2015|newspaper=Politics UK|language=en-GB|access-date=13 November 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191113121337/https://www.politics.co.uk/news/2015/12/21/telegraph-fined-30-000-for-vote-tory-email|archive-date=13 November 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> === LGBT+ rights === In 2012, prior to the legalisation of [[same-sex marriage in the United Kingdom]], Telegraph View published an editorial stating that it was a "pointless distraction" as "many [gay couples] already avail themselves of the [[Civil union|civil partnerships]] introduced by [[Labour Party (UK)|Labour]]".<ref>{{Cite web|title=Gay marriage: A pointless distraction|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/telegraph-view/9429173/Gay-marriage-A-pointless-distraction.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/telegraph-view/9429173/Gay-marriage-A-pointless-distraction.html |archive-date=11 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|access-date=6 March 2021|website=The Telegraph|date=26 July 2012 |language=en-GB}}{{cbignore}}</ref> ''The Telegraph'' wrote in another editorial that same year that it feared that changing "the law on gay marriage risks inflaming anti-homosexual bigotry".<ref>{{Cite web|title=A marriage proposal fraught with pitfalls|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/telegraph-view/9145917/A-marriage-proposal-fraught-with-pitfalls.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/telegraph-view/9145917/A-marriage-proposal-fraught-with-pitfalls.html |archive-date=11 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|access-date=6 March 2021|website=The Telegraph|date=15 March 2012 |language=en-GB}}{{cbignore}}</ref> In 2015, the newspaper published an article by former editor [[Charles Moore, Baron Moore of Etchingham|Charles Moore]] claiming a "gay rights [[sharia]]" was dictating what the LGBT+ community should believe, following [[Dolce & Gabbana]]'s openly gay founders criticising gay adoptions. Moore wrote: "If you are gay, Mr Strudwick seemed to assert, there are certain things you must believe. Nothing else is permitted under the gay rights sharia."<ref>{{Cite web|title=In the headlong rush for 'rights', children are an afterthought|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/conservative/11485526/In-the-headlong-rush-for-rights-children-are-an-afterthought.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/conservative/11485526/In-the-headlong-rush-for-rights-children-are-an-afterthought.html |archive-date=11 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|access-date=30 September 2020|website=The Telegraph|date=21 March 2015 |language=en-GB}}{{cbignore}}</ref> Moore has previously expressed his views that civil partnerships achieved a "balance" for heterosexual and homosexual couples.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Ukip's Rochester win shows voters no longer trust the main parties|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/ukip/11246048/Ukips-Rochester-win-shows-voters-no-longer-trust-the-main-parties.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/ukip/11246048/Ukips-Rochester-win-shows-voters-no-longer-trust-the-main-parties.html |archive-date=11 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|access-date=6 March 2021|website=The Telegraph|date=22 November 2014 |language=en-GB}}{{cbignore}}</ref> In 2013, he wrote: "Respectable people are truly terrified of being thought anti-homosexual. In a way, they are right to be, because attacking people for their personal preferences can be a nasty thing."<ref>{{Cite web|title=David Cameron would like to forget gay marriage, but it will haunt him|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/10049451/David-Cameron-would-like-to-forget-gay-marriage-but-it-will-haunt-him.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/10049451/David-Cameron-would-like-to-forget-gay-marriage-but-it-will-haunt-him.html |archive-date=11 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|access-date=6 March 2021|website=The Telegraph|date=10 May 2013 |language=en-GB}}{{cbignore}}</ref> Also in 2015, ''The Telegraph'' published its "Out at Work" list, naming "the top 50 list of LGBT executives".<ref>{{Cite web|title=Out at Work: The top 50 list of LGBT executives|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/11349808/Out-at-Work-The-top-50-list-of-LGBT-executives.html |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/11349808/Out-at-Work-The-top-50-list-of-LGBT-executives.html |archive-date=11 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|access-date=6 March 2021|website=The Telegraph|date=16 January 2015 |language=en-GB}}{{cbignore}}</ref>{{importance inline|date=August 2023}} Since then, ''The Telegraph'' appeared to shift towards a more liberal attitude on LGBT+ issues, publishing articles that then-Prime Minister [[Theresa May]] needed to be "serious about LGBT equality"<ref>{{Cite news|last=Segalov|first=Michael|date=21 October 2016|title=If Theresa May is serious about LGBT equality, she needs to offer more than pardons|language=en-GB|work=The Telegraph|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/21/if-theresa-may-is-serious-about-lgbt-equality-she-needs-to-offer/ |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/21/if-theresa-may-is-serious-about-lgbt-equality-she-needs-to-offer/ |archive-date=11 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|access-date=6 March 2021|issn=0307-1235}}{{cbignore}}</ref> and that "bathroom bills" in Texas β which were criticised as being transphobic β were "a [[Franz Kafka|Kafkaesque]] state intrusion".<ref>{{Cite news|last=Cunliffe|first=Rachel|date=11 January 2017|title=Transgender 'bathroom bills' are a Kafkaesque state intrusion β and Republicans should oppose them|language=en-GB|work=The Telegraph|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/11/transgender-bathroom-bills-kafkaesque-state-intrusion-republicans/ |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/11/transgender-bathroom-bills-kafkaesque-state-intrusion-republicans/ |archive-date=11 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|access-date=6 March 2021|issn=0307-1235}}{{cbignore}}</ref> The newspaper also featured an article written by [[Maria Munir]] about their experience coming out to [[Barack Obama|President Barack Obama]] as [[Non-binary gender|non-binary]].<ref>{{Cite news|last=Munir|first=Maria|date=27 April 2016|title=Why I came out as non-binary to Barack Obama|language=en-GB|work=The Telegraph|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/27/why-i-came-out-as-non-binary-to-barack-obama/ |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/27/why-i-came-out-as-non-binary-to-barack-obama/ |archive-date=11 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|access-date=6 March 2021|issn=0307-1235}}{{cbignore}}</ref> [[Stonewall (charity)|Stonewall]] CEO Ruth Hunt penned an article in ''The Telegraph'' after the [[Orlando nightclub shooting]] in June 2016 that the attack on a gay nightclub "grew out of everyday homophobia".<ref>{{Cite news|last=Hunt|first=Ruth|date=13 June 2016|title=The Orlando shooting grew out of everyday homophobia β we cannot be complacent|language=en-GB|work=The Telegraph|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/13/the-orlando-shooting-grew-out-of-everyday-homophobia--we-cannot/ |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/13/the-orlando-shooting-grew-out-of-everyday-homophobia--we-cannot/ |archive-date=11 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|access-date=6 March 2021|issn=0307-1235}}{{cbignore}}</ref> Also in 2016, Telegraph Executive Director [[Guy Black, Baron Black of Brentwood|Lord Black]] was awarded Peer of the Year at the 2016 [[PinkNews]] Awards for his campaigning on LGBT rights.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Lord Black: PinkNews -|url=https://www.guyblack.org.uk/news/lord-black-pinknews-peer-year|access-date=6 March 2021|website=Guy Black|date=26 October 2016|language=en|archive-date=16 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210516051329/https://www.guyblack.org.uk/news/lord-black-pinknews-peer-year|url-status=live}}</ref> ''The Telegraph'' has published articles which have been criticised by ''[[PinkNews]]'' as [[Transphobia|transphobic]].<ref>{{Cite web|date=11 January 2019|title=Daily Telegraph criticised for anti-trans NHS women's wards article|url=https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2019/01/11/daily-telegraph-transphobic-headline/|access-date=4 January 2021|website=PinkNews|language=en-GB|archive-date=29 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201129234120/https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2019/01/11/daily-telegraph-transphobic-headline/|url-status=live}}</ref> In 2017, the newspaper published an article by [[Allison Pearson]] titled: "Will our spineless politicians' love affair with LGBT ever end?", arguing that [[National Health Service|NHS]] patients' being asked their sexual orientation was unnecessary and another in 2018 with the headline: "The tyranny of the transgender minority has got to be stopped".<ref>{{Cite news|last=Pearson|first=Allison|date=16 October 2018|title=The tyranny of the transgender minority has got to be stopped|language=en-GB|work=The Telegraph|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/tyranny-transgender-minority-has-got-stopped/ |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/tyranny-transgender-minority-has-got-stopped/ |archive-date=11 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|access-date=4 January 2021|issn=0307-1235}}{{cbignore}}</ref><ref name="Pearson">{{Cite news|last=Pearson|first=Allison|date=17 October 2017|title=Will our spineless politicians' love affair with LGBT ever end?|language=en-GB|work=The Telegraph|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/will-spineless-politicians-love-affair-lgbt-ever-end/ |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20220111/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/will-spineless-politicians-love-affair-lgbt-ever-end/ |archive-date=11 January 2022 |url-access=subscription |url-status=live|access-date=4 January 2021|issn=0307-1235}}{{cbignore}}</ref> Summary: Please note that all contributions to Christianpedia may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Christianpedia:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission! Cancel Editing help (opens in new window) Discuss this page