Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.

==== Specific contraceptives contested by plaintiffs ====
The plaintiffs believed that life began at [[Fertilisation|conception]] which they equated to [[fertilization]], and objected to their businesses providing health insurance coverage to their female employees of four [[Food and Drug Administration|FDA]]-approved [[birth control|contraceptives]] that the plaintiffs believed prevented [[implantation (human embryo)|implantation of a fertilized egg]].<ref>{{cite news|last=Carroll|first=Aaron E.|date=June 30, 2014|title=How Hobby Lobby ruling could limit access to birth control|newspaper=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/02/upshot/how-hobby-lobby-ruling-could-limit-access-to-birth-control.html|access-date=July 2, 2014|archive-date=July 1, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140701182059/http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/02/upshot/how-hobby-lobby-ruling-could-limit-access-to-birth-control.html|url-status=live}}</ref> The plaintiffs believed the following forms of birth control constituted an [[abortion]]:<ref>{{cite news|last=Liptak|first=Adam|date=June 30, 2014|title=Supreme Court rejects contraceptives mandate for some corporations. Justices rule in favor of Hobby Lobby|newspaper=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/01/us/hobby-lobby-case-supreme-court-contraception.html|access-date=July 2, 2014|archive-date=July 1, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140701141819/http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/01/us/hobby-lobby-case-supreme-court-contraception.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Barnes|first=Robert|date=June 30, 2014|title=Supreme Court sides with employers over birth control mandate|newspaper=The Washington Post|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/supreme-court-sides-with-employers-over-birth-control-mandate/2014/06/30/852e5c84-fc61-11e3-b1f4-8e77c632c07b_story.html|access-date=July 2, 2014|archive-date=July 1, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140701174801/http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/supreme-court-sides-with-employers-over-birth-control-mandate/2014/06/30/852e5c84-fc61-11e3-b1f4-8e77c632c07b_story.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Richey|first=Warren|date=June 30, 2014|title=Supreme Court rules against contraceptive mandate in Hobby Lobby case|newspaper=The Christian Science Monitor|url=http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2014/0630/Supreme-Court-rules-against-contraceptive-mandate-in-Hobby-Lobby-case-video|access-date=July 4, 2014|archive-date=July 4, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140704113327/http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2014/0630/Supreme-Court-rules-against-contraceptive-mandate-in-Hobby-Lobby-case-video|url-status=live}}</ref>
* [[Emergency contraception|Emergency contraceptive]] pills
** [[levonorgestrel]] (sold under the brand name Plan B among others)
** [[ulipristal acetate]] (sold under the brand name Ella among others)
* [[Intrauterine device]]s (IUDs)
** [[copper IUD]]s (sold under the brand name ParaGard among others)
** [[Hormonal IUDs]] (sold under the brand names Mirena and Skyla among others)