Filioque

===Further reading===
{{refbegin|2|indent=yes}}
* Bradshaw, David. ''Aristotle East and West: Metaphysics and the Division of Christendom''. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp.&nbsp;214–220.
* Farrell, Joseph P. ''[http://dialectic.wordpress.com/ghd/ God, History, & Dialectic: The Theological Foundations of the Two Europes and Their Cultural Consequences]''. Bound edition 1997. Electronic edition 2008.
* Groppe, Elizabeth Teresa. ''Yves Congar's Theology of the Holy Spirit''. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004. See esp. pp.&nbsp;75–79, for a summary of Congar's work on the ''Filioque''. Congar is widely considered the most important Roman Catholic ecclesiologist of the twentieth century. He was influential in the composition of several Vatican II documents. Most important of all, he was instrumental in the association in the West of pneumatology and ecclesiology, a new development.
* Haugh, Richard. ''Photius and the Carolingians: The Trinitarian Controversy''. Belmont, MA: Nordland Publishing Company, 1975.
* John St. H. Gibaut, "The ''Cursus Honorum'' and the Western Case Against Photius", ''Logos'' 37 (1996), 35–73.
* {{cite book|editor-last=Habets|editor-first=Myk|year=2014|title=Ecumenical perspectives on the Filioque for the 21st century|series=T&T Clark theology|location=London; New York|publisher=Bloomsbury Academic|isbn=978-0-56750072-4|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=v9TeBAAAQBAJ}}<!-- parked, might read and add these broad 21st cent. perspectives -->
* [[Joseph Jungmann|Jungmann, Joseph]]. ''Pastoral Liturgy''. London: Challoner, 1962. See "Christ our God", pp.&nbsp;38–48.
* [[James Likoudis|Likoudis, James]]. ''Ending the Byzantine Greek Schism''. New Rochelle, New York: 1992. An apologetic response to polemical attacks. A useful book for its inclusion of important texts and documents; see especially citations and works by [[Thomas Aquinas]], O.P., [[Demetrios Kydones]], Nikos A. Nissiotis, and Alexis Stawrowsky. The select bibliography is excellent. The author demonstrates that the ''Filioque'' dispute is only understood as part of a dispute over papal primacy and cannot be dealt with apart from [[ecclesiology]].
* Marshall, Bruce D. "''Ex Occidente Lux?'' Aquinas and Eastern Orthodox Theology", ''Modern Theology'' 20:1 (January 2004), 23–50. Reconsideration of the views of Aquinas, especially on deification and grace, as well as his Orthodox critics. The author suggests that Aquinas may have a more accurate perspective than his critics, on the systematic questions of theology that relate to the ''Filioque'' dispute.
* Reid, Duncan. ''Energies of the Spirit: Trinitarian Models in Eastern Orthodox and Western Theology''. Atlanta, Georgia: Scholars Press, 1997.
* Smith, Malon H. ''And Taking Bread: Cerularius and the Azyme Controversy of 1054''. Paris: Beauschesne, 1978. This work is still valuable for understanding cultural and theological estrangement of East and West by the turn of the millennium. Now, it is evident that neither side understood the other; both Greek and Latin antagonists assumed their own practices were normative and authentic.
* Webb, Eugene.  ''In Search of The Triune God: The Christian Paths of East and West''. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press, 2014.
* Ware, Timothy (Kallistos). ''The Orthodox Way''. Revised edition. Crestwood, New York: 1995, pp.&nbsp;89–104.
{{refend}}

<!-- {{No more links}}

 Please be cautious adding more external links.

Wikipedia is not a collection of links and should not be used for advertising.

 Excessive or inappropriate links will be removed.

 See [[Wikipedia:External links]] and [[Wikipedia:Spam]] for details.

If there are already suitable links, propose additions or replacements on
the article's talk page, or submit your link to the relevant category at
the Open Directory Project (dmoz.org) and link there using {{Dmoz}}. -->

{{Christian theology}}
{{Authority control}}

[[Category:Filioque| ]]
[[Category:Christian terminology]]
[[Category:Western Christianity]]
[[Category:Nicene Creed]]