Raw Story Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.Anti-spam check. Do not fill this in! ===False claims=== On February 19, 2018, ''Raw Story'' published a report claiming that [[Russian web brigades|Russian trolls]] co-opting the [[Me Too movement]] had forced [[Minnesota]] senator [[Al Franken]] to resign, and that an article by writer [[Ijeoma Oluo]] had been used as part of the campaign.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /> Oluo told Snopes that her article had been published after Franken announced his resignation, adding: "I was hoping that the piece would give people context and help people grow from all of this into a better place."<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|last=Palma|first=Bethania|date=February 20, 2018|title=Did 'Bots' Force Al Franken to Resign?|url=https://www.snopes.com/news/2018/02/19/bots-force-al-franken-resign/|access-date=June 25, 2021|website=[[Snopes]]|language=en-US|archive-date=November 10, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211110041843/https://www.snopes.com/news/2018/02/19/bots-force-al-franken-resign/|url-status=live}}</ref> ''Raw Story'' later retracted its report.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|last=Ingram|first=Matthew|date=February 21, 2018|title=The media today: Are Russian trolls behind everything?|url=https://www.cjr.org/the_media_today/russian-trolls.php|access-date=June 25, 2021|website=[[Columbia Journalism Review]]|language=en|archive-date=December 4, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211204020703/https://www.cjr.org/the_media_today/russian-trolls.php|url-status=live}}</ref> During the [[2020 United States presidential election]], ''Raw Story'' published an article on November 4, 2020, which claimed that the [[United States Postal Service]] (USPS) had failed to deliver 27 percent of [[Postal voting|mail-in ballots]] in [[South Florida]]. [[PolitiFact]] determined that the figure was based on a misreading of Postal Service data, and the USPS stated that it had skipped some steps to get ballots to election offices faster.<ref name=":4">{{Cite web|last=Greenberg|first=Jon|date=November 5, 2020|title=Claim that postal service failed to deliver 27% of mail-in ballots in South Florida is 100% wrong|url=https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/nov/05/blog-posting/claim-postal-service-failed-deliver-27-mail-ballot/|access-date=June 24, 2021|website=[[PolitiFact]]|language=en-US|archive-date=May 16, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210516004047/https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/nov/05/blog-posting/claim-postal-service-failed-deliver-27-mail-ballot/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Sadeghi|first=McKenzie|date=November 17, 2020|title=Fact check: False claim that 27% of mail-in ballots in South Florida not delivered|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/11/17/fact-check-false-claim-mail-ballot-delivery-south-florida/6203779002/|access-date=2021-08-21|website=[[USA Today]]|language=en-US|archive-date=August 21, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210821023256/https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/11/17/fact-check-false-claim-mail-ballot-delivery-south-florida/6203779002/|url-status=live}}</ref> According to a study by researchers from the [[University of Liverpool]] and [[University of Dundee]], published in the journal ''[[Discourse & Society]]'', the headline in another 2020 article in ''Raw Story'' engaged in the [[Reification (fallacy)|fallacy of ambiguity]] by using "the phrasal verb ‘cashing in on’" to create the appearance of impropriety in reporting on a business owned by [[Jared Kushner]] when, according to Snopes, there was "no evidence that the startup is linked to any public damage".<ref name="dands">{{cite journal |title=From fallacies to semi-fake news: Improving the identification of misinformation triggers across digital media |journal=[[Discourse & Society]] |date=April 23, 2022 |volume=33 |issue=3 |first1=Elena |last1=Musi |first2=Chris |last2=Reed|pages=349–370 |doi=10.1177/09579265221076609 |s2cid=250429139 |doi-access=free }}</ref> According to the researchers, this use of "polysemous terms in news titles ... [is] potentially misleading for the majority of readers who are used to getting their daily news feed scrolling through news titles".<ref name="dands"/> Summary: Please note that all contributions to Christianpedia may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Christianpedia:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission! Cancel Editing help (opens in new window) Discuss this page