Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.

== Further reading ==
* {{cite book|last1=Brougher|first1=Cynthia|title=Free Exercise of Religion by Closely Held Corporations: Implications of Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.|date=July 23, 2014|publisher=Congressional Research Service|location=Washington, D.C.|url=http://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43654.pdf|access-date=7 August 2014}}
*Chatman, Carliss (2018). [https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nlj/vol18/iss3/6 "The Corporate Personhood Two-Step."] ''Nevada Law Journal''. '''18''': 811–861.
* {{cite journal |last1=Gedicks |first1=Frederick Mark |last2=Koppelman |first2=Andrew |title=Invisible Women: Why an Exemption for Hobby Lobby Would Violate the Establishment Clause |journal=Vanderbilt Law Review en Banc |volume=67 |pages=51–66 |year=2014 |url=http://www.vanderbiltlawreview.org/content/articles/2014/03/Gedicks-and-Koppelman_Invisible-Women.pdf |access-date=2014-07-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140714131802/http://www.vanderbiltlawreview.org/content/articles/2014/03/Gedicks-and-Koppelman_Invisible-Women.pdf |archive-date=2014-07-14 |url-status=dead }}
* Ewan McGaughey, 'Fascism-Lite in America (or the social idea of Donald Trump)' (2016) [https://ssrn.com/abstract=2773217 TLI Think! Paper 26/2016]
* {{cite journal |last=Rosenbaum |first=Sara |title=When Religion Meets Workers' Rights: Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood Specialties |journal=Milbank Quarterly |volume=92 |issue=2 |pages=202–206 |year=2014 |doi=10.1111/1468-0009.12054 |pmc=4089368 |pmid=24890244}}
*Rachel VanSickle-Ward and Kevin Wallsten. 2019. ''The Politics of the Pill: Gender, Framing, and Policymaking in the Battle over Birth Control''. Oxford University Press.