Ignosticism

==Distinction from theological noncognitivism==
Ignosticism and [[theological noncognitivism]] are similar although whereas the ignostic says "every theological position assumes too much about the concept of God",<ref>{{harvnb|Lindsay|2015|page=73}}</ref> the theological noncognitivist claims to have no concept whatever to label as "a concept of God",<ref>Conifer, ''Theological Noncognitivism'': "Theological noncognitivism is usually taken to be the view that the sentence 'God exists' is cognitively meaningless."</ref> but the relationship of ignosticism to other nontheistic views is less clear. While [[Paul Kurtz]] finds the view to be compatible with both [[weak atheism]] and agnosticism,<ref>Kurtz, ''New Skepticism'', 220: "Both [atheism and agnosticism] are consistent with igtheism, which finds the belief in a metaphysical, transcendent being basically incoherent and unintelligible."</ref> other philosophers{{Who|date=March 2018}} consider ignosticism to be distinct.