Idolatry Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.Anti-spam check. Do not fill this in! ==Prehistoric and ancient civilizations== The earliest so-called [[Venus figurine]]s have been dated to the prehistoric [[Upper Paleolithic]] era (35β40 ka onwards).<ref>{{cite magazine | url=http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/the-cave-art-debate-100617099/ | title =The Cave Art Debate | magazine =Smithsonian Magazine | date=March 2012}}</ref> Archaeological evidence from the islands of the [[Aegean Sea]] have yielded Neolithic era [[Cycladic art|Cycladic]] figures from 4th and 3rd millennium BC, idols in ''[[namaste]]'' {{which|date=May 2021}} posture from Indus Valley civilization sites from the 3rd millennium BC, and much older [[petroglyph]]s around the world show humans began producing sophisticated images.<ref>{{cite book|author=Richard G. Lesure|title=Interpreting Ancient Figurines: Context, Comparison, and Prehistoric Art|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WyW9RK6l8b0C&pg=PA11 |year=2011|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-1-139-49615-5|pages=11β12}}</ref><ref>National Museum, [http://nationalmuseumindia.gov.in/prodCollections.asp?pid=36&id=1&lk=dp1 Seated Male in Namaskar pose], New Delhi, Government of India;<br />S Kalyanaraman (2007), Indus Script Cipher: Hieroglyphs of Indian Linguistic Area, Motilal Banarsidass, {{ISBN|978-0982897102}}, pages 234β236</ref> However, because of a lack of historic texts describing these, it is unclear what, if any connection with religious beliefs, these figures had,<ref name="Moorey2003p1"/> or whether they had other meaning and uses, even as toys.<ref>S. Diamant (1974), [https://www.jstor.org/stable/30103292 A Prehistoric Figurine from Mycenae], The Annual of the British School at Athens, Vol. 69 (1974), pages 103β107</ref><ref>JΓRGEN THIMME (1965), [https://www.jstor.org/stable/41319151 DIE RELIGIΓSE BEDEUTUNG DER KYKLADENIDOLE], Antike Kunst, 8. Jahrg., H. 2. (1965), pages 72β86 (in German)</ref><ref>{{cite book|author1=Colin Beckley|author2=Elspeth Waters|title=Who Holds the Moral High Ground?|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=eT3XAAAAMAAJ|year=2008|publisher=Societas Imprint Academic|isbn=978-1-84540-103-0|pages=10β11}}</ref> The earliest historic records confirming cult images are from the ancient Egyptian civilization, thereafter related to the Greek civilization.<ref name="Johnson2010p50">{{cite book|author=Barbara Johnson|title=Moses and Multiculturalism |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xcuKoT9OhrIC&pg=PA50 |year=2010|publisher=University of California Press|isbn=978-0-520-26254-6|pages=50β52}}</ref> By the 2nd millennium BC two broad forms of cult image appear, in one images are zoomorphic (god in the image of animal or animal-human fusion) and in another anthropomorphic (god in the image of man).<ref name="Moorey2003p1">{{cite book|author=Peter Roger Stuart Moorey|title=Idols of the People: Miniature Images of Clay in the Ancient Near East|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sPuDxBBoHEQC&pg=PA1 |year=2003|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-726280-1|pages=1β15}}</ref> The former is more commonly found in ancient Egypt influenced beliefs, while the anthropomorphic images are more commonly found in Indo-European cultures.<ref name="Johnson2010p50"/><ref name="Adams1997p44">{{cite book|author=Douglas Q. Adams|title=Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tzU3RIV2BWIC |year=1997|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-884964-98-5|pages=44, 125β133, 544β545}}</ref> Symbols of nature, useful animals or feared animals may also be included by both. The [[Stele|stelae]] from 4,000 to 2,500 BC period discovered in France, Ireland through Ukraine, and in Central Asia through South Asia, suggest that the ancient anthropomorphic figures included zoomorphic motifs.<ref name="Adams1997p44"/> In Nordic and Indian subcontinent, bovine (cow, ox, -*gwdus, -*g'ou) motifs or statues, for example, were common.<ref name="Sax2001p48">{{cite book|author=Boria Sax|title=The Mythical Zoo: An Encyclopedia of Animals in World Myth, Legend, and Literature|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Y3Gr7qTarfIC|year=2001|publisher=ABC-CLIO|isbn=978-1-57607-612-5|pages=48β49}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Douglas Q. Adams|title=Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tzU3RIV2BWIC |year=1997|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-884964-98-5|pages=124, 129β130, 134, 137β138}}</ref> In Ireland, iconic images included pigs.<ref>{{cite book|author=James Bonwick|title=Irish Druids and Old Irish Religions|url=https://archive.org/details/irishdruidsando01bonwgoog |year=1894| publisher=Griffith, Farran|pages=[https://archive.org/details/irishdruidsando01bonwgoog/page/n243 230]β231}}</ref> The [[Ancient Egyptian religion]] was polytheistic, with large cult images that were either animals or included animal parts. Ancient Greek civilization preferred human forms, with idealized proportions, for divine representation.<ref name="Johnson2010p50"/> The Canaanites of West Asia incorporated a golden calf into their pantheon.<ref name=johnson21>{{cite book|author=Barbara Johnson|title=Moses and Multiculturalism |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=xcuKoT9OhrIC |year=2010|publisher=University of California Press|isbn=978-0-520-26254-6|pages=21β22, 50β51}}</ref> The ancient philosophy and practices of the Greeks, thereafter Romans, were imbued with polytheistic idolatry.<ref>{{cite book|author=Sylvia Estienne|editor=[[Rubina Raja]] and JΓΆrg RΓΌpke|title=A Companion to the Archaeology of Religion in the Ancient World|url= https://books.google.com/books?id=iOldBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA379 |year=2015|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|isbn=978-1-4443-5000-5|pages=379β384}}</ref><ref name="Urbano2013">{{cite book|author=Arthur P. Urbano|title=The Philosophical Life|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xZ8TAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA213 |year=2013|publisher=Catholic University of America Press|isbn=978-0-8132-2162-5|pages=212β213 with footnotes 25β26}}</ref> They debate what is an image and if the use of image is appropriate. To [[Plato]], images can be a remedy or poison to the human experience.<ref name="Dawson2008"/> To [[Aristotle]], states Paul Kugler, an image is an appropriate mental intermediary that "bridges between the inner world of the mind and the outer world of material reality", the image is a vehicle between sensation and reason. Idols are useful psychological catalysts, they reflect sense data and pre-existing inner feelings. They are neither the origins nor the destinations of thought but the intermediary in the human inner journey.<ref name="Dawson2008">{{cite book|author=Paul Kugler|editor1-link=Polly Young-Eisendrath|editor1=Polly Young-Eisendrath |editor2=Terence Dawson|title=The Cambridge Companion to Jung |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=5dZUM7ogtQYC&pg=PA78 |year=2008|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-1-139-82798-0|pages=78β79}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Christopher Norris|title=New Idols of the Cave: On the Limits of Anti-realism|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NRfpAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA106 |year=1997|publisher=Manchester University Press|isbn=978-0-7190-5093-0|pages=106β110}}</ref> Fervid opposition to the idolatry of the Greeks and Romans was of [[Early Christianity]] and later Islam, as evidenced by the widespread desecration and defacement of ancient Greek and Roman sculptures that have survived into the modern era.<ref>{{cite book|author=David Sansone|title=Ancient Greek Civilization|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cVUWDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA275|year=2016|publisher=Wiley|isbn=978-1-119-09814-0|pages=275β276}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Sidney H. Griffith|title=The Church in the Shadow of the Mosque: Christians and Muslims in the World of Islam |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-p66UJWB3WIC&pg=PA143 |year=2012|publisher=Princeton University Press|isbn=978-1-4008-3402-0|pages=143β145}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last=King | first=G. R. D. | title=Islam, iconoclasm, and the declaration of doctrine | journal=Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies | volume=48 | issue=2 | year=1985 | page=267 | doi=10.1017/s0041977x00033346 | s2cid=162882785 }}</ref> Summary: Please note that all contributions to Christianpedia may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Christianpedia:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission! Cancel Editing help (opens in new window) Discuss this page