Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.

===Cases following SCOTUS ruling===
''[[Forbes]]'' reported that following the ruling in ''Burwell v. Hobby Lobby'', "the Supreme Court vacated the judgment against [[Eden Foods]] and sent the case back to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2014/07/03/hobby-lobby-fallout-catholic-soy-milk-mogul-wont-cover-drugs-that-prevent-procreation/|title=Hobby Lobby Fallout: Catholic Soy Milk Mogul Won't Cover Drugs That 'Prevent Procreation'|last=O'Connor|first=Clare|date=3 July 2014|work=[[Forbes]]|access-date=13 July 2014|archive-date=14 July 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140714133501/http://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2014/07/03/hobby-lobby-fallout-catholic-soy-milk-mogul-wont-cover-drugs-that-prevent-procreation/|url-status=live}}</ref>

On November 6, 2015, the [[Supreme Court of the United States]] decided it will hear arguments for the case of ''[[Zubik v. Burwell]]'' combined with six other challenges—including ''[[Priests for Life]] v. Burwell'', ''[[Southern Nazarene University v. Burwell]]'', ''[[Geneva College v. Burwell]]'',
''[[Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington v. Burwell]]'', ''[[East Texas Baptist University v. Burwell]]'', ''[[Little Sisters of the Poor]] Home for the Aged v. Burwell''—to the [[contraceptive mandate]] of Obamacare.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.goodreads.com/author_blog_posts/9429815-court-grants-all-seven-nonprofit-petitions-in-contraceptive-coverage-cas|title=Jack Balkin's Blog - Court grants all seven nonprofit petitions in contraceptive coverage cases, henceforth to be collectively referred to as &quot;Zubik v. Burwell&quot; [UPDATED to include briefing schedule] - November 18, 2015 05:40|website=Goodreads.com|access-date=July 4, 2019|archive-date=August 11, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190811164512/https://www.goodreads.com/author_blog_posts/9429815-court-grants-all-seven-nonprofit-petitions-in-contraceptive-coverage-cas|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://balkin.blogspot.com/2015/11/who-is-zubik-in-zubik-v-burwell-and-why.html|title=Balkinization: Who is the "Zubik" in Zubik v. Burwell . . . and why is he allegedly complicit in the use of contraception? [UPDATED with list and categorization of all 37 petitioners]|website=balkin.blogspot.com|access-date=2019-07-04|archive-date=2019-07-04|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190704192519/https://balkin.blogspot.com/2015/11/who-is-zubik-in-zubik-v-burwell-and-why.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.scotusblog.com/2015/11/court-to-hear-birth-control-challenges/|title=Court to hear birth-control challenges (UPDATED)|date=November 6, 2015|website=SCOTUSblog|access-date=July 4, 2019|archive-date=July 4, 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190704192526/https://www.scotusblog.com/2015/11/court-to-hear-birth-control-challenges/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://blogs.findlaw.com/supreme_court/2015/11/scotus-will-hear-all-the-obamacare-contraception-exemption-cases.html|title=SCOTUS Will Hear All the Obamacare Contraception Exemption Cases|website=Findlaw|date=6 November 2015|access-date=27 June 2018|archive-date=22 September 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180922120638/https://blogs.findlaw.com/supreme_court/2015/11/scotus-will-hear-all-the-obamacare-contraception-exemption-cases.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/zubik-v-burwell/|title=Zubik v. Burwell|website=SCOTUSblog|access-date=2019-07-04|archive-date=2019-07-04|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190704192526/https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/zubik-v-burwell/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/14-1418.htm/|title=Search - Supreme Court of the United States|website=Supremecourt.gov|access-date=2022-07-04|archive-date=2022-05-20|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220520184332/https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=%2Fdocketfiles%2F14-1418.htm%2F|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/14-1453.htm|title=Search - Supreme Court of the United States|website=Supremecourt.gov|access-date=2022-07-04|archive-date=2022-05-20|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220520184332/https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=%2Fdocketfiles%2F14-1453.htm|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/15-110.htm|title=Search - Supreme Court of the United States|website=Supremecourt.gov|access-date=2022-07-04|archive-date=2022-05-20|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220520184332/https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=%2Fdocketfiles%2F15-110.htm|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/14-1505.htm|title=Search - Supreme Court of the United States|website=Supremecourt.gov|access-date=2022-07-04|archive-date=2022-05-20|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220520184332/https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=%2Fdocketfiles%2F14-1505.htm|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/15-101.htm|title=Search - Supreme Court of the United States|website=Supremecourt.gov|access-date=2022-07-04|archive-date=2022-05-20|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220520184332/https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=%2Fdocketfiles%2F15-101.htm|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/15-105.htm|title=Search - Supreme Court of the United States|website=Supremecourt.gov|access-date=2022-07-04|archive-date=2022-05-20|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220520184333/https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=%2Fdocketfiles%2F15-105.htm|url-status=live}}</ref>