Associated Press

=== All Headline News ===
In January 2008, the AP sued competitor [[All Headline News]] (AHN) claiming that AHN allegedly infringed on its copyrights and a contentious "quasi-property" right to facts.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Schonfeld|first=Erick|title=Hot News: The AP Is Living In The Last Century|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/22/AR2009022201243.html|date=February 22, 2009|access-date=April 25, 2010|newspaper=The Washington Post|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110604165028/http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/22/AR2009022201243.html|archive-date=June 4, 2011|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news | last= Anderson | first= Nate | title= Who owns the facts? The AP and the "hot news" controversy | work= Ars Technica | url= https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/05/who-owns-the-facts-the-ap-and-the-hot-news-controversy.ars | access-date=June 14, 2017 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111231024500/http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/05/who-owns-the-facts-the-ap-and-the-hot-news-controversy.ars | archive-date=2011-12-31 | url-status= live }}</ref> The AP complaint asserted that AHN reporters had copied facts from AP news reports without permission and without paying a syndication fee. After AHN moved to dismiss all but the copyright claims set forth by the AP, a majority of the lawsuit was dismissed.<ref>{{Cite court|litigants=The Associated Press v. All Headline News Corp.|vol=08|reporter=Civ.|opinion=323|court=United States District Court, Southern District of New York |date=February 17, 2009|url= https://www.scribd.com/doc/12637101/Decision-AP-Hot-News-Doctrine}}</ref> The case has been dismissed and both parties settled.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.citmedialaw.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-06-15-Order%20of%20Dismissal.pdf |title=Citizen Media Law Project |access-date=June 4, 2014}}</ref>