Pedophilia Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.Anti-spam check. Do not fill this in! ==== Cognitive behavioral therapy ==== [[Cognitive behavioral therapy]] (CBT) aims to reduce attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors that may increase the likelihood of sexual offenses against children. Its content varies widely between therapists, but a typical program might involve training in self-control, social competence and empathy, and use [[cognitive restructuring]] to change views on sex with children. The most common form of this therapy is [[relapse prevention]], where the patient is taught to identify and respond to potentially risky situations based on principles used for treating addictions.{{r|seto|p=171}} The evidence for cognitive behavioral therapy is mixed.{{r|seto|p=171}} A 2012 [[Cochrane Collaboration|Cochrane Review]] of randomized trials found that CBT had no effect on risk of reoffending for contact sex offenders.<ref name="cochrane">{{cite journal | vauthors = Dennis JA, Khan O, Ferriter M, Huband N, Powney MJ, Duggan C | year = 2012 | title = Psychological interventions for adults who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending | journal = Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | volume = 12 | issue = 12 | pages = CD007507 | doi = 10.1002/14651858.CD007507.pub2 | pmid = 23235646 }}</ref> Meta-analyses in 2002 and 2005, which included both randomized and non-randomized studies, concluded that CBT reduced recidivism.<ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = LΓΆsel F, Schmucker M | year = 2005 | title = The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: a comprehensive meta-analysis | journal = Journal of Experimental Criminology | volume = 1 | issue = 1 | pages = 117β46 | doi=10.1007/s11292-004-6466-7 | s2cid = 145253074 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | vauthors = Hanson RK, Gordon A, Harris AJ, Marques JK, Murphy W, etal | year = 2002 | title = First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of treatment for sex offenders | journal = Sexual Abuse | volume = 14 | issue = 2 | pages = 169β94 | doi=10.1177/107906320201400207 | pmid = 11961890 | s2cid = 34192852 }}</ref> There is debate over whether non-randomized studies should be considered informative.<ref name=SetoReview/><ref name="rice2012">{{cite book | vauthors = Rice ME, Harris GT | year = 2012 | chapter = Treatment for adult sex offenders: may we reject the null hypothesis? | title = Handbook of Legal & Ethical Aspects of Sex Offender Treatment & Management | veditors = Harrison K, Rainey B | location = London, England | publisher = [[Wiley-Blackwell]]}}</ref> More research is needed.<ref name="cochrane"/> Summary: Please note that all contributions to Christianpedia may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Christianpedia:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission! Cancel Editing help (opens in new window) Discuss this page